It could be good if Tanaka make something like this: ;-)which EA is best outcome so far you think
do you have any non repainting indicators profitable please share
https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/20937
It could be good if Tanaka make something like this: ;-)which EA is best outcome so far you think
do you have any non repainting indicators profitable please share
It passed my 16years bactest from 2003-2019Do you think that is really profitable shown in the video link you provided
Bro this good system please make eaHi guys
As I see that enough people would like to know how good their indicator is, testing it with an Ea.
I thought the following:
I am going to try to make a Simple Ea for all with the indicator that you share here.
So we can identify how good an indicator is, with respect to another.
The EA will be simple and for all indicators equal:
TP 50
SL 60
The EA will take the H1 signal
Only 1 trade at the same time, until it closes, there will be no other.
The operations will be opened with the first candle in which the signal goes off, 20 minutes later (to try to avoid false signals, indecisions of the indicator)
Remember this:
I am not a programmer, And neither an Expert, I just want to help and discover good indicators.
The indicators have to be in mq4 please.
If I find good indicators on my own, I will also make them EAs, and I will share them here.
I will only share the EAs in ex4, without any limitations in time or anything.
Reason:
I do not want if we are lucky enough to find something good here, someone can sell it, so, anyone will come to soehoe.id, and download the EA.
Free from All to All
I understand that the EA will be very basic, but this helps to make backs of your indicator, also, we have the opion to use:
RoNz_Auto_SL-TS-TP
This EA can control the SL and TP of other EA, with the ability of Trailing Stop and Hide them ...
I will make an backtest for the EA:
EURUSD 6 month
H1
Spread in fxt Dukascopy data, 10
Leverage 100
Nothing else, I hope we get something good from here![]()
Dear Fotios1968, please share here your setfileback test very slow but look like teh best ea you have made so farView attachment 69430
forgeted, repaINThope not repaint
Hi sarah what ea do you use?no problem, i am so happy with the others (I win more than 4,8% daily now with your EAs) If you search something contact me in PM i will help you with pleasure
Boss kindly finish update on EA dynasty and radarHere you go.
I fixed attack martin bug, so you can change N of attack martin =1 for safety.
BTW, I can not find EA_dynasty trader, can you past URL which I uploaded in this thread?
I am working on a real account, I have set all the threads to 0, so that I only launch the 3 initial orders and manually closing the negative ones for twice the profit. But I can not be eternally in front of the pc, if the master could get us the stop loss would be perfect. I'll upload the configurations and BT I do.could you please share your set file please and time frame pairs you have tested with intial amount$ ?
Dear Fotios1968, please share here your setfile
Thank you so much in advance
regards
Sarah
superarrows change with this indicator bro, this different indicator but the same parameter
Hi Tanaka, this version og megafx on M5 EURUSD seems good in backtest. I am in testing process from 2003-2019. It is really slow. Is there any possibility to make EA more faster in backtests?Are you using RevC?
You are using buy-sell stop? Your set file is so good, I fixed bug and now stoploss is placed when you use buy-sell stop order.
It looks like without stoploss with busket profit is even better!
Does this EA have no stoploss? You want the same stoploss for Hilo & 1.5 & 1.6?Hello Mr. Tanaka, could you include in this ea Stop Loss?
The ea would be quite safe with this characteristic, since when the martingales are activated it is when it becomes dangerous. For now I try to control the drowdown with only 2 orders and an external ea that watches me the equity.
But if we had this option, the ea could work with a single order (no martingale) and I think it would be very safe.
Thanks for your work, by the way I loved the modification of being able to disable two of the logics![]()