Suggestion I will make a Free EA with your Indicator

[tanaka akiko]

Hello Mr. Tanaka, in my previous post I meant if you could add the same parameters to Trio Orchestra, like this:

Stoploss (it could be useful as well)
Use Solo Piano: true/false
Use Solo Violin: true/false
Use Solo Cello: true/false

..plus, the things you previously added in the last version:

custom comments
news filter
basket profit

Thanks a lot in advance for you time, I really appreciate your efforts!

P.S: I also asked why, in your opinion, the MaxLots parameter doesn't work..it's strange but true, I verified it in real and demo accounts..

Oh, it looks like max lot is not coding inside..... That is why...
Do you want me to code it?
What does max lot mean?
If total oders lot size is more than XX lOTS, then stop EA??
Or if orders reach to xxx lot size, then stop orders??

 

[tanaka akiko]

Please mr tanaka akiko chek this reaquest

Give me some time, there are so many requests even in private . I don't have enough time,
Please don't send me private requests. I will code EA in this thread first!

 

[tanaka akiko]

Mr. Tanaka Get ready, because this is something that nobody has ever proposed, it will not be easy but it will be the mission of your life

I will post the code of a robot that I have programmed and adjusted for a year.

I am a very programmer and I have been trying to do something that I do not have the knowledge to do on my own, I would do it to sell, but I think I should be formidable and share with everyone, because in forex we have wealth for all of us.

This STARK robot, I'm a fan of Iron Man Haha, is a martingale. I know that many have prejudices about it. But I use it in 2 ways, if I'm going to trade in EUR / GBP, I open 2 charts and I put STARK 1 just to SELL and STARK2 just to BUY, what happens?

It turns out that you simply make money VERY QUICKLY, but with a long time or very strong news, the robot can break your bankroll.

The strategy I'm going to propose is this: I want you to make stark 1 and stark 2 recognize the orders 1 of the other.
After that I want it to have a summation logic of positions of the '' brother '' robot, if stark 1 has 8 SALE positions, which are 0.2 lot adding all together. The robot STARK2 that is opening purchases, in spite of opening to 0.01 it will open with 1/3 (ONE THIRD of the martingale lot open) but when the martingale is closed with profit, it closes the position of 1/3 also, and the cycle is renewed again at 0.01, both bought and sold!

I know it's a complex thing, but I'm sure that would be absurdly profitable and would make you profit from good values. I await your position SR TANAKA

Follow the code of my life attached =)

Remembering you, it will not be possible to do an accurate back-testing of this robot because they work in sets, nor do I know if it is possible to develop what I asked SR TANAKA, so I really hope this is POSSIBLE, since I know that this strategy would be Winning !

LET'S WIN AGAIN

Thanks, I will check...

 

[xander cage]

Oh, it looks like max lot is not coding inside..... That is why...
Do you want me to code it?
What does max lot mean?
If total oders lot size is more than XX lOTS, then stop EA??
Or if orders reach to xxx lot size, then stop orders??

The second: if orders reach to XXX lot size, then stop orders..but not every order, just the ones that require a lot that is above the XXX value..do you think that would be possible to code it that way?

 

[xander cage]

The second: if orders reach to XXX lot size, then stop orders..but not every order, just the ones that require a lot that is above the XXX value..do you think that would be possible to code it that way?

..it seems also that the new EA doens't open any positions now

 

[tanaka akiko]

The second: if orders reach to XXX lot size, then stop orders..but not every order, just the ones that require a lot that is above the XXX value..do you think that would be possible to code it that way?

What about this? if you set max lot size =0.9LOT (for example)
BUY 0.1LOT
SELL 0.2LOT
BUY 0.1LOT
SELL 0.5LOT
----------------------
Total 0.9LOT
If your total order lot size is 0.9LOTs, stop new orders, so you can minimize lot size increase and risk.
Backtest is working, right?

For me it is working fine.

 

[Rocky16]

What about this? if you set max lot size =0.9LOT (for example)
BUY 0.1LOT
SELL 0.2LOT
BUY 0.1LOT
SELL 0.5LOT
----------------------
Total 0.9LOT
If your total order lot size is 0.9LOTs, stop new orders, so you can minimize lot size increase and risk.
Backtest is working, right?

For me it is working fine.
View attachment 71040

View attachment 71041

Hi Tanaka,
I have tested 50K starting balance Trio EA (EU pair) with start lot 0.01 and it didn't survive . The EA is good to some point but the main problem I see is that all 3 engines are trading on the same time frame. It might be much better if each engine TF could have different inputs...for example one would be traded on M15, the other on H1 and the third on H4. Because all 3 indys EA is using give too similar values on the same TF, but they would start trading at very different points in time if CCI would give M15 value, Stoch H1 value and RSI H4 value. Maybe worth thinking about it....

Green pips to you and thank you for your excellent work

 

[omarbns]

Give me some time, there are so many requests even in private . I don't have enough time,
Please don't send me private requests. I will code EA in this thread first!

Sorry mr tanaka akiko i i just want to upgrade th EA that you already made i didnt mean to send private requests

 

[xander cage]

What about this? if you set max lot size =0.9LOT (for example)
BUY 0.1LOT
SELL 0.2LOT
BUY 0.1LOT
SELL 0.5LOT
----------------------
Total 0.9LOT
If your total order lot size is 0.9LOTs, stop new orders, so you can minimize lot size increase and risk.
Backtest is working, right?

For me it is working fine.
View attachment 71040

View attachment 71041

I don't know why, but backtest of this EA doesn't work on my usual MT4
I just tested it in another MT4 and it works fine, I guess the other MT4 was too old


About your idea for the MaxLots parameter: sounds GREAT to me

About the post of Rocky16..it seems that this Trio Orchestra version is exactly the same as the famous AF Global, which I don't have the mql4 file..
Trio Orchestra is better than Ilan TrioKS in backtest, which is not identical to AF Global..
I'm testing Trio Orchestra on a real account, and I'm quite sure that with the correct initial lot, the right max amount of positions and the max number of lots it will survive almost any market condition on EURUSD..that's why I'm asking you these adjustments

 

[Rocky16]

I don't know why, but backtest doesn't work on my MT4 I guess it's a problem of my platform then, even if I tested a lot of EAs with this..I'll try to load it into another..
About your idea for the MaxLots parameter: sounds GREAT to me

About the post of Rocky16..it seems that this Trio Orchestra version is exactly the same as the famous AF Global, which I don't have the mql4 file..
Trio Orchestra is better than Ilan TrioKS in backtest, which is not identical to AF Global..
I'm testing Trio Orchestra on a real account, and I'm quite sure that with the correct initial lot, the right max amount of positions and the max number of lots it will survive almost any market condition on EURUSD..that's why I'm asking you these adjustments

I tested 50K with 0.01 starting lot! The profits per year were 10K and in second year DD was 50K. Sure it can survive with 100K maybe but profits would be 10% per year and DD still 5 times bigger. Good profitable consistent EA should have more average yearly gain then max DD in 10 years. Maybe you do not understand that but think about it. If you use 50% equity stop on 100K account it will take you 5 years to recover from that loss!!!! If you use 5% equity stop it can be hit more then once per year if it is bad year and the result is also bad. I'm sure you do understand that not all EAs that can survive are good . If they don't bring profits they are not good. ( the numbers above were examples but the max DD and profits per year ratio is real and bad on this EA)

 

[xander cage]

I tested 50K with 0.01 starting lot! The profits per year were 10K and in second year DD was 50K. Sure it can survive with 100K maybe but profits would be 10% per year and DD still 5 times bigger. Good profitable consistent EA should have more average yearly gain then max DD in 10 years. Maybe you do not understand that but think about it. If you use 50% equity stop on 100K account it will take you 5 years to recover from that loss!!!! I'm sure you do understand that not all EAs that can survive are good . If they don't bring profits they are not good. ( the numbers above were examples but the max DD and profits per year ratio is real and bad on this EA)

If you tested it with the base pipstep value, your backtest is useless..try to triplicate that value, in AF Global it's set on 180 instead of 50.....9/10 max positions per strategy..you'll see the difference Also..backtest is a thing, forward test on a real account is another one

 

[Rocky16]

If you tested it with the base pipstep value, your backtest is useless..try to triplicate that value, in AF Global it's set on 180 instead of 50.....9/10 max positions per strategy..you'll see the difference Also..backtest is a thing, forward test on a real account is another one

Bro, I used 20 pips (200 points step) . Say you for example limit trades to 5. The only thing you do with this is limit blowup, but the loss can still grow and it takes forever to get out. The EA as is is not good, even if Tanaka manages max lot it will help locking in part of DD but if trend persists you cannot get out of the trade ever and you will have to take a loss that will take a long time to recover.

But, test it yourself with quick candles test 2014 until today and you will definitly stop trading it on real account.

 

[xander cage]

Bro, I used 20 pips (200 points step) . Say you for example limit trades to 5. The only thing you do with this is limit blowup, but the loss can still grow and it takes forever to get out. The EA as is is not good, even if Tanaka manages max lot it will help locking in part of DD but if trend persists you cannot get out of the trade ever and you will have to take a loss that will take a long time to recover.

But, test it yourself with quick candles test 2014 until today and you will definitly stop trading it on real account.

5 trades is definitely not enough for this kind of EA..anyway, there's no need to discuss about this..let's Tanaka finish his job..thank you for the advice anyway, for me every opinion is always welcome!

P.S.: anyway, if you have some safe and sustainable strategy to share, I'm all ears!

 

[Rocky16]

5 trades is definitely not enough for this kind of EA..anyway, there's no need to discuss about this..let's Tanaka finish his job..thank you for the advice anyway, for me every opinion is always welcome!

P.S.: anyway, if you have some safe and sustainable strategy to share, I'm all ears!

EA win rate 90% looks promissing, but too early to say, needs much more long term testing..maybe even some new adjustments. I posted 2.5 years tick test result and set yesterday..you can play with it and see if you can improve it.

 

[xander cage]

EA win rate 90% looks promissing, but too early to say, needs much more long term testing..maybe even some new adjustments. I posted 2.5 years tick test result and set yesterday..you can play with it and see if you can improve it.

Sure, I will! And thanks for your efforts to improve the strategies here

 

[dafik]

This is what happens with this set file on EU alone- M30 ( I'm sure XAUUSD is definitly the same):

Ronaldo may have profits for 15 days or a month or two, but if he will keep using this set file his account is in great danger!

Hi, I agree with you. I didn't sleep much last night and made a lot of simulation with superarrow & one another EA from this forum. I found that made long backtests is waste of time. You can try only some periods with big trend to find if EA is stable. There is several those periods last few years. All of this EAs completely failed in those periods of time. No way without stop losses.

 

[vadvid]

this just one day test, give me more time

Ok I'm really curious about it.

 

[omarbns]

Give me some time, there are so many requests even in private . I don't have enough time,
Please don't send me private requests. I will code EA in this thread first!

Mr tanaka akiko th EA(EA_rsi ma mtf alerts arrows d1(revA)) you made it very powerful but it open trades without known the trend direction take a look at picture 1 and 3
and take a look at the picture number 2 and 4 after puting shady 2019 indicator hi will know when to open buy and when to open sell .some time shady 2019 indicator gives fast signal one sell and after 15 min buy the EA have pen sell then it have change to open buy with multiple lot like he does always .so the same indicater just use shady2019 indicator like filter to know when to open buy trade or sell trade i think that will make him a very powerful EXPERT ADVISOR once again i m sorry and thank you for your great help

 

[Rocky16]

One more profitable set file- it is not drop dead profitable but last 4 years no blowup and it is a start. Guys, if you want results test like crazy and share here otherwise we will be stuck! Try to improve my set file- same DD bigger profits. But first task is limiting DD once this is managed then profits can have full attention.

 

[Rocky16]

Hi, I agree with you. I didn't sleep much last night and made a lot of simulation with superarrow & one another EA from this forum. I found that made long backtests is waste of time. You can try only some periods with big trend to find if EA is stable. There is several those periods last few years. All of this EAs completely failed in those periods of time. No way without stop losses.

Many fail, not all this is a difference. It is just that Ronaldo's set file is doomed to fail sooner or later. With bad luck it can happen next week.

But, this doesn't mean one or 2 days of testing is enough. There are many pairs, time frames and inputs to test on many EAs ( thanks to Tanaka) and you have your whole life ahead of you to search for a good enough EA and set file. Might take you months of testing but even every small improvement in results count. You can forget getting rich quick in forex, it is a business.

If Tanaka would give up after 2 days like you are suggesting he would not be here and you would have nothing to test. So take him as a role model!