Here you goThnx, but I mean AF Global, and not AF Scalp
Here you goThnx, but I mean AF Global, and not AF Scalp
i shar evry thing
sir do you have a setting for this EA working below 500$
I think if you need some other settings, you would take too much time to realize profit. what you would probably need is a lot of leverage. I have used $500 with good leverage and the outcome was equally nice.sir do you have a setting for this EA working below 500$
1:2000 is it good enough?I think if you need some other settings, you would take too much time to realize profit. what you would probably need is a lot of leverage. I have used $500 with good leverage and the outcome was equally nice.
sir, does this EA have spread setting?
Here you go
Thank you brother, It was very useful, I need an unlimited version of scalper wicks + scalper V7, I have scalper wicks and scalper V7 but scalper V7 disabled for me, Now i can't attach this version on chart, please help me, if you can please send an unlimited copy of this expert or Scalper V5 with no expireDear friends, welcome
A very famous site that promotes its own programming in amounts exceeding $ 5000 per copy
After investigating and investigating the facts and collecting information, I found him to be just a scaaaam
In the coming photos a copy was distributed by the site owner
View attachment 65202
View attachment 65203
And that's another copy
View attachment 65204
View attachment 65205
Both versions currently have expired
View attachment 65206
View attachment 65207
I found that programming is just settings
In the download you will find the copies sold by the owners of the site
You will find my version in the settings and run without Limite
Be careful not to buy any software from this site
the first file have icefx news and the second doesn't have it but EA is the samewhat is the difference between both indicators? in first file we found af global expert (102kb) the second one has 102 kb
Well, with $200, you would trade just one pair. When you get up to $500, you then increase it to 2 pairs.1:2000 is it good enough?
I want to try 200$