• Welcome back! Thank you for being a part of this Traders Community. Let's discuss and share :)
    Selamat datang kembali! Trimakasih telah menjadi bagian dari Komunitas Trader ini. Mari berdiskusi dan berbagi :)

Suggestion Need coder for very profitable strategy PZ TREND with confirmation indicators.

thats like the weather man changing his forecast mid day after he has looked out the window. What we want is good indicators that dont disappear on us and are reliable on a live chart, end of story
then how to use that crossover indicator????? i trade manually
 
A refreshed chart is not the same. All indicators look back at the data x number of bars to produce a signal. If you refresh a chart in the future that data has changed, so yes by that all indicators are repainting. If you find one that can predict future data please share lol
or just i look for pz slop when its change color then open trade?????
 
I have been trading manually with it with no problem. It is only one indicator in the system so we dont rely only on this indicator. Here are two trades I took today for an example on the cad. Both trades we have all three conditions met.
 

Attachments

  • bandicam 2018-05-16 22-25-12-649.jpg
    bandicam 2018-05-16 22-25-12-649.jpg
    165.8 KB · Views: 143
this chart is live and has not been refreshed. You can see we have all three conditions met although you cant see the value of wyfx nitro strength at the time it was over the 50% so I took both trades. I hope I am clear.
 
that arrow and dot should appear same time and pz slop change color right this are three rule wyfx should be above 50% right?
 
You can use either the arrow or the dot. You will find that the arrow may appear a few bars back only one the dot appears, sometime they both appear at the same time. You can use either one. Then in order to enter a trade the other conditions must be met which means tthe PZSlope is in the same direction and strength is at least 50% same direction. Use this on 15 min charts and you will find consitently good trades. Trade only high volume trading hours, during london and newyork sessions
 
ok thanks bro i was using on 1mnt chart for more trades opportunities .. but now i wll use on 15 chart and follow that rules...
 
Here are a few more examples from yesterday. The pound trade I took even with 40% strength. Hope this has been helpful
 

Attachments

  • bandicam 2018-05-14 07-21-04-238.jpg
    bandicam 2018-05-14 07-21-04-238.jpg
    145.4 KB · Views: 225
  • bandicam 2018-05-11 10-14-19-839.jpg
    bandicam 2018-05-11 10-14-19-839.jpg
    127 KB · Views: 222
i got this pair three rules match and i have open buy trade here.. what about SL and TP how much we should keep??
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    174.1 KB · Views: 205
Hi well I agree with you on a bunch of points. Developing a long term profitable EA maybe like waiting for Godot but we can try. I am working on changing the settings and time frames. I am able to trade this successfully manually so in theory an EA development should be possible. Trust me when I say I have tried almost every system out there including baskets and martingale baskets and hedging with or without baskets etc etc. I am going to play around with the setting on this and trading hours and see where it goes. Here are the results from yesterday on 9 pairs. And thank you for your thoughts. Nice to have the support of other traders as talking to people who have not put the thousands of hours in just dont get it and how much goes into getting to the point of being a profitable one.
David

You know off course that Godot never came… ;)

Let me put it another way. As you so rightly said, you have to put in the thousands of hours. There is no short cut to success in this very hard business. However a strange thing happens if you put in those hours. Especially if you stick to one instrument. You find you are able to recognise moves you have seen before. Such as how it reacts to news. For example after the first reaction does it go up on bad news or down on good. Its telling you something if you know how to listen. How does it react to on an oversize or undersize bar. The list is endless. You cannot get that from an EA. That comes with the thousands of hours. Nor does not come to all. I know some who have been trading for 10 years but have got nowhere. They do not know how to listen and jump from system to system and instrument to instrument. No MT4 or MT5 EA is going to help them there.

That is not to say that one cannot develop an automated system that works. Just look at Renaissance Capital in the US. They develop EAs using AI that learn as they go and make huge amount of money. So much so that they are closed to new investment. However these are not made for sale. Each EA costs them on average over $3m to develop. Thats a far cry from the $99 all winning grid or martingale or whatever the vendors offer.

I realise writing all this is entirely futile. No one wants to hear it so its aimed mainly at you as I get the impression you are almost there having put in the work. My suggestion, given with the best of intentions, is forget the EA and continue as you were.
 
You know off course that Godot never came… ;)

Let me put it another way. As you so rightly said, you have to put in the thousands of hours. There is no short cut to success in this very hard business. However a strange thing happens if you put in those hours. Especially if you stick to one instrument. You find you are able to recognise moves you have seen before. Such as how it reacts to news. For example after the first reaction does it go up on bad news or down on good. Its telling you something if you know how to listen. How does it react to on an oversize or undersize bar. The list is endless. You cannot get that from an EA. That comes with the thousands of hours. Nor does not come to all. I know some who have been trading for 10 years but have got nowhere. They do not know how to listen and jump from system to system and instrument to instrument. No MT4 or MT5 EA is going to help them there.

That is not to say that one cannot develop an automated system that works. Just look at Renaissance Capital in the US. They develop EAs using AI that learn as they go and make huge amount of money. So much so that they are closed to new investment. However these are not made for sale. Each EA costs them on average over $3m to develop. Thats a far cry from the $99 all winning grid or martingale or whatever the vendors offer.

I realise writing all this is entirely futile. No one wants to hear it so its aimed mainly at you as I get the impression you are almost there having put in the work. My suggestion, given with the best of intentions, is forget the EA and continue as you were.
Um actually thats not true Im sure I saw him in Starbucks just the other day lol...
Yes perhaps this is futile, but to be breaking even with an EA is good so we are on the right track. My manual trading of course is much more successful. As far as the big boys go, I am sure that a lot more is said at the lunch meeting with insider knowledge to give them the edge...as we all know its about who you know than what you know. Alas us poor lowly fools have to pick up the scraps that are left behind, which I dont mind as long as I have enough to eat...ie I dont need a ridiculous luxury yacht or stupid bimbo Lambo etc...
Thanks for the advise, and will keep you posted. I am not the monogomous type and willing to settle down with just one instrument just yet lol
D
 
bandicam 2018-05-17 10-31-45-964.jpg
Here are the trades from today. The example above is of entry of the EA (first trade) and second a continuation trade triggerd by PZLOPEZTREND which I entered manually. We are working on how to have the EA take these types of continuation trades
 

Attachments

  • bandicam 2018-05-17 10-31-45-964.jpg
    bandicam 2018-05-17 10-31-45-964.jpg
    174.8 KB · Views: 643
Hi David,
Just playing around to understaScreenshot_20180517-232552.png Screenshot_20180517-232331.png nd how this work.
Dont understand why position is not taken once % is greater than 10?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20180517-232552.png
    Screenshot_20180517-232552.png
    259.9 KB · Views: 163
  • Screenshot_20180517-232331.png
    Screenshot_20180517-232331.png
    261.1 KB · Views: 162
Back
Top