try this one it seems to be the same
MT4 - XAUUSD TS0
- Thread starter Alexandr45
- Start date
try this one with set TF 1mn
- Credits
- 114
full version pls
- Credits
- 243
thankx so always same : loss
- Credits
- 243
how you do or what broker you use to have medelling quality upper than 90%
- Credits
- 243
The backtest modeling quality has nothing to do with the broker. It is a separate tick data software for MT4.
please share your history data file.csv
expired please to you have a fixed one or more longer active ?This EA is optimized for:
:Balance: 10,000 cent account
Pair: XAUUSD (Gold)
Timeframe:M30
Broker: 2-digit pricing
View attachment 171426
View attachment 171427
forget it Man
This gentleman posts all expired software.
He doesn't read Soehoe policy. He is selling his product through this site......
Waste of time...
Please, Admin, can you do something about it?
It will be appreciated
Max
- Credits
- 114
je veux version complete de ce ea svp
merci
merci
samshoshoEA
New Member
- Credits
- 10
I’d start by checking whether the strategy is actually robust to execution differences, not just to the bar model.
For XAUUSD systems, the main failure points are spread expansion, session-specific volatility, and entry logic that depends on candle timing. A useful test matrix is: same logic on different spread regimes, fixed lot vs. risk-based sizing, and a truly untouched out-of-sample window.
If the edge disappears only on real-tick data, the setup may be too sensitive to the market open, news spikes, or thin-liquidity hours.
For XAUUSD systems, the main failure points are spread expansion, session-specific volatility, and entry logic that depends on candle timing. A useful test matrix is: same logic on different spread regimes, fixed lot vs. risk-based sizing, and a truly untouched out-of-sample window.
If the edge disappears only on real-tick data, the setup may be too sensitive to the market open, news spikes, or thin-liquidity hours.