• Welcome back! Thank you for being a part of this Traders Community. Let's discuss and share :)
    Selamat datang kembali! Trimakasih telah menjadi bagian dari Komunitas Trader ini. Mari berdiskusi dan berbagi :)

New EA Auto Trading Portfolio (Free EA, No Expiration)

Reader mode
autotradingportfolio said:
Dear traders

These are rules you need to remember :
1. All of the results we present here are merely based on backtest, please don't overestimate the EA.
2. The backtest maybe inaccurate, the future result maybe worse, losses may occur.
3. We always suggest to backtest the EA before you forward test it, if you do FT, please use demo account first.
4. We can't guaraantee anything at all, you trade at your own risk, please never blame us for the loss.
5. If you still have doubt with this EA, please don't do anything with it, you'll only waste your time, energy, and computer resource for doing backtest or FT.
6. Please remember that, the only guaranteed method to avoid losses from this EA is by NOT using it.

Our apologies, by writing those rules we don't mean to be rude or arrogant, we just don't want to be blamed or moreover called as a scammer. You should now from the very beginning, forex trading is a risky bussiness.

Best regards and always keep your trades safe.
Click to expand...
Go ahead sir big thanks
 
Most of the traders here don't have enough patience while trading. My account have DD in 2 months, but I am keeping it running because my BT is the same as my FT. Again, none EA can predict the future, market might change and this EA can not profit anymore. Using it or not is our choice, autotradingportfolio is so good to give us his free EA, I think it worth more than that.
 
autotradingportfolio said:
Hi Raffus

Maybe you mean the version 2.0, because this is the first version we release in this forum, we don't put the version number on the EA name.

Yes it's true that version 2.0 has higher System Quality Number (SQN is the standard value we use to measure the performance) than the later versions (version 3.0 and 4.0) based on backtest, if you read our previous posts, you'll know that version 3.0 and 4.0 are not the replacement for version 2.0/2.9, we use different approach for the later versions, the main difference is, it has fixed, visible hard SL and TP.

We develop version 3.0 and 4.0 because some members complaint the lack of SL and TP, In fact the version 2 has internal SL and TP mechanism that is not visible.

They also complaint for very long trading period and also the profit eating swap fees, we use no swap acount, so we have no problem with swap, but not all members can afford it.

While the version 2.0 has higher SQN, the later version has adventage too, it's easier to update thanks to it's fixed SL and TP.

Which one is better? we don't know, maybe version 2.0 or maybe version 3.0/4.0, or maybe both of them bad. It depends on your situation, will you able to withstand the very long trading period? Can you trade without SL and TP? Do you have a non swap account?

Best regards.
Click to expand...

Hi autotradingportfolio , I have replaced my v2 with v4, old opening positions seem not to be sync by v4, because tp and sl is not created. So I want to ask if v4 EA can handle current v2 positions ?

Thank you
 
autotradingportfolio said:
Hi Raffus

Maybe you mean the version 2.0, because this is the first version we release in this forum, we don't put the version number on the EA name.

Yes it's true that version 2.0 has higher System Quality Number (SQN is the standard value we use to measure the performance) than the later versions (version 3.0 and 4.0) based on backtest, if you read our previous posts, you'll know that version 3.0 and 4.0 are not the replacement for version 2.0/2.9, we use different approach for the later versions, the main difference is, it has fixed, visible hard SL and TP.

We develop version 3.0 and 4.0 because some members complaint the lack of SL and TP, In fact the version 2 has internal SL and TP mechanism that is not visible.

They also complaint for very long trading period and also the profit eating swap fees, we use no swap acount, so we have no problem with swap, but not all members can afford it.

While the version 2.0 has higher SQN, the later version has adventage too, it's easier to update thanks to it's fixed SL and TP.

Which one is better? we don't know, maybe version 2.0 or maybe version 3.0/4.0, or maybe both of them bad. It depends on your situation, will you able to withstand the very long trading period? Can you trade without SL and TP? Do you have a non swap account?

Best regards.
Click to expand...

Hi autotradingportfolio ,
Thanks for your quick and fast reply. Yes I'm using the first version v2 with all 10 currentc pairs and the swap issue can be really a problem. No problem from my side trading with a visible sl or tp, if they are present but hidden.
I think i will change v.2 with v.4 for the currency where is now available hoping the latest version can managing open trades.
Thanks
 
Great work ATP,
How bout we help them out and put these on FT's to see how they go in a more real environment and give good feedback. I have done the backtests and seen where the EA's sit in the scheme of things and tested them also over a 5 year period. It is rare to see an EA that has a Equity line above the balance line which is great to see.
I will keep updates on how the EA's are going in amongst the portfolio of other EA's I have running .

Great work and much appreciated, the best we can do is test and see how we can help improve it.

Cheers
Greg
 
autotradingportfolio said:
Hi Jean-Leon

Yes, if you're using 0.01 lot size, the maximum total lot size would be 2 lots or 200.000 unit, if your account is 10.000 then you need minimum 1:20 leverage which is quite low and still below ESMA limitation which is 1:30.

The EAs will unlikely open 20 trades at same time for all pairs, it's not grid EA afterall.

Please clarify if I miss your points here.
Click to expand...

Thanks autotradingportfolio,
No problem, I know that ATP_Prototype is not grid. My question was just and exactely about ESMA rules and margin call.
Regards
 
Dear traders,

ATP Prototype EURJPY 4.0 H1 has been uploaded, please check the first post.

Also please reduce your Risk_Multiplier if you trade multiple pairs.

The portfolio result for all 4 pairs is attached below.

And don't forget these golden rules

1. All of the results we present here are merely based on backtest, please don't overestimate the EA.
2. The backtest maybe inaccurate, the future result maybe worse, losses may occur.
3. We always suggest to backtest the EA before you forward test it, if you do FT, please use demo account first.
4. We can't guaraantee anything at all, you trade at your own risk, please never blame us for the loss.
5. If you still have doubt with this EA, please don't do anything with it, you'll only waste your time, money, energy, and computer resource for doing backtest or FT.
6. Please remember that the only guaranteed method to avoid losses from this EA is by NOT using it.

Best regards.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
autotradingportfolio said:
Dear traders,

ATP Prototype EURJPY 4.0 H1 has been uploaded, please check the first post.

Also please reduce your Risk_Multiplier if you trade multiple pairs.

The portfolio result for all 4 pairs is attached below.

And don't forget these golden rules

1. All of the results we present here are merely based on backtest, please don't overestimate the EA.
2. The backtest maybe inaccurate, the future result maybe worse, losses may occur.
3. We always suggest to backtest the EA before you forward test it, if you do FT, please use demo account first.
4. We can't guaraantee anything at all, you trade at your own risk, please never blame us for the loss.
5. If you still have doubt with this EA, please don't do anything with it, you'll only waste your time, money, energy, and computer resource for doing backtest or FT.
6. Please remember that the only guaranteed method to avoid losses from this EA is by NOT using it.

Best regards.
Click to expand...
Thx Sir We will test .
 
Thank You!!! you are te boss!!!
autotradingportfolio said:
Dear traders,

ATP Prototype EURJPY 4.0 H1 has been uploaded, please check the first post.

Also please reduce your Risk_Multiplier if you trade multiple pairs.

The portfolio result for all 4 pairs is attached below.

And don't forget these golden rules

1. All of the results we present here are merely based on backtest, please don't overestimate the EA.
2. The backtest maybe inaccurate, the future result maybe worse, losses may occur.
3. We always suggest to backtest the EA before you forward test it, if you do FT, please use demo account first.
4. We can't guaraantee anything at all, you trade at your own risk, please never blame us for the loss.
5. If you still have doubt with this EA, please don't do anything with it, you'll only waste your time, money, energy, and computer resource for doing backtest or FT.
6. Please remember that the only guaranteed method to avoid losses from this EA is by NOT using it.

Best regards.
Click to expand...
 
Hi autotradingportfolio,
This message just to inform you that, today, I opened one real account and one demo account with EURGBP, EURJPY ans EURCHF to see if there are difference beetween.
In a few days (one or two weeks), I'll compare these two accounts with backtest on exactly the same period and will share my conclusions... of course !...
For instance, it's exactly the same trades in demo or real. Wait and see !...
 
Jean-Leon said:
Hi autotradingportfolio,
This message just to inform you that, today, I opened one real account and one demo account with EURGBP, EURJPY ans EURCHF to see if there are difference beetween.
In a few days (one or two weeks), I'll compare these two accounts with backtest on exactly the same period and will share my conclusions... of course !...
For instance, it's exactly the same trades in demo or real. Wait and see !...
Click to expand...

Way too short timeframe. This is a LONGTERM strategy. Some trades will be open for months. You guys seem to underestimate this horribly. It is not like getting a clear picture in some days or weeks.

You can do it of course, but then it is no real help. If you look for giving a serious picture or contribution, let it run for at least three month before giving any feedback. This way you can test your patience with the strategy by the way, which you will need in general using this EA.
 
Drolph said:
Way too short timeframe. This is a LONGTERM strategy. Some trades will be open for months. You guys seem to underestimate this horribly. It is not like getting a clear picture in some days or weeks.

You can do it of course, but then it is no real help. If you look for giving a serious picture or contribution, let it run for at least three month before giving any feedback. This way you can test your patience with the strategy by the way, which you will need in general using this EA.
Click to expand...
No problem Drolph, I exactly agree with you. What I made is for compare demo, real and backtest orders because I backtested all pairs with ATP_Prototype since 2005 and the results are good. So i think if the orders are correctly repliqued in demo and live, we can have good results with time.
So, in two or three weeks, I'll can have correct view concerning the replication ; and need three or four month to evaluate the result... I know that !
Regards
 
Reader mode
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top