New EA Auto Trading Portfolio (Free EA, No Expiration)
- Thread starter autotradingportfolio
- Start date
autotradingportfolio
Active Member
- Credits
- 0
Hi, if you set auto_lot to true, you don't need to change anything, entry lot won't affect your lot size. And risk_multiplier 4.0 is too big in opinion.
autotradingportfolio
Active Member
- Credits
- 0
The test version has it's own problem, it trades rarely, sometimes once a month, it seems trades oftenly because it has many strategies built in it, but each strategy trades very rarely.
vincent Tan
New Member
- Credits
- 0
This is my review for this thread:
nice
nice
Thx . But I am asking any plan in future for more relase pareis hevy v back test amazing ??
This is my review for this thread:
hard work and free
I have the same question. How your boss code it?Because I cannot crack it.Someone said "hard code",what it means?
Based on my experiment,it is more alike fxb EA, which have 20 strategies inside.
And ATP is a long term EA or trend EA, it is the same with fxb.
But based on the author's introduction, the signals seems better than fxb.
And according to the BT result, ATP is better than fxb.
While what's the fxb strategy?
The author of fxb(an Iranese) work very hard and optimized 20 sets of good long term parameters, also based on normal MT4 indicators. It is more alike ATP.
So 20 orders entry and exit by its own way.Totally, maybe 16 wins, 4 loss, then 12 wins after all.
After BT, review this EA, I strongly recommend ATP.If you want real it,do it and believe it for long time.Be patient,and no worry.
Finally thank again to the author and his boss as well.
Hope ATP can benefit everyone.
hard work and free
I have the same question. How your boss code it?Because I cannot crack it.Someone said "hard code",what it means?
Based on my experiment,it is more alike fxb EA, which have 20 strategies inside.
And ATP is a long term EA or trend EA, it is the same with fxb.
But based on the author's introduction, the signals seems better than fxb.
And according to the BT result, ATP is better than fxb.
While what's the fxb strategy?
The author of fxb(an Iranese) work very hard and optimized 20 sets of good long term parameters, also based on normal MT4 indicators. It is more alike ATP.
So 20 orders entry and exit by its own way.Totally, maybe 16 wins, 4 loss, then 12 wins after all.
After BT, review this EA, I strongly recommend ATP.If you want real it,do it and believe it for long time.Be patient,and no worry.
Finally thank again to the author and his boss as well.
Hope ATP can benefit everyone.
Last edited:
- Credits
- 0
I could not believe, that this EAs made really good profits until last months and then started to make negative as I started to use them live. So I made more backtests, and more and more to find the failure.
After all these backtests I really think now, that it is too much curve fitted as autotradingportfolio mentioned before.
Version 2.0 was release in August. As you can see with this Overview: The profits started to drop in July 2018 (I think the 2.0 version of the EA is developed with data before June or July 2018) and got worse month per month until now.
Version 4.0 was released in September/Oktober. Here the profits starts to go down a bit later:
I am really sorry, I really liked these EAs. The 4.0 seems to be more fitted to the last month but also there in August the profits started to drop. Unfortunately I do believe that these EAs will make profits in the future with this development status.
autotradingportfolio What do you think about this? You have more insight in the development and modification between different versions.
After all these backtests I really think now, that it is too much curve fitted as autotradingportfolio mentioned before.
Version 2.0 was release in August. As you can see with this Overview: The profits started to drop in July 2018 (I think the 2.0 version of the EA is developed with data before June or July 2018) and got worse month per month until now.
Version 4.0 was released in September/Oktober. Here the profits starts to go down a bit later:
I am really sorry, I really liked these EAs. The 4.0 seems to be more fitted to the last month but also there in August the profits started to drop. Unfortunately I do believe that these EAs will make profits in the future with this development status.
autotradingportfolio What do you think about this? You have more insight in the development and modification between different versions.
Attachments
autotradingportfolio
Active Member
- Credits
- 0
Yes you're correct, It may be curvefitted, but it's not like we intentionally curvefitted it, we've done everything we can, such as Montecarlo simulation, Out of sample period and high spread simulation, currently we develop an experimental EA with historical data from 1999 which is test EA lite and heavy version, everything looks okay, but we don't know how will it goes in the future.
We try to avoid several methods such as grid, martingale or any progressive lot size, big SL/small TP, and very tight SL/Trailing Stop. Such robots can be easily found in this forum
And for other users especially for you puppu197 , from the beginning we already said that this EA is still not finished and still on early development phase and the profitability is still not proven.
If it's the perfect EA you all want, we won't upload any progress and update anymore, we may upload it next year or two years, or may be later when the development is finished and the EA will have been tested in some real account, which I don't know when. No offense
Best regards.
kitchenfucker
Member
- Credits
- 0
so pity 
autotradingportfolio
Active Member
- Credits
- 0
Bye
heavy V I agree the best one please go ahead with other paries but I have question the expert read the hostirecal data