New EA Auto Trading Portfolio (Free EA, No Expiration)
- Thread starter autotradingportfolio
- Start date
autotradingportfolio
Active Member
- Credits
- 0
Yes, some counting text will help alot.
No attachments
- Credits
- 0
BUT THE LINK TO SEE
autotradingportfolio
Active Member
- Credits
- 0
No, don't make a false accussation just because you get loss on the first month.In the code are there values for fake tests?
Our EAs are neither martingale or scalper, if you want to get profit every month, there are tons of martingale and scalper EA in this forum that claimed to be tested and profitable to try. After all you only use 4 pairs, it'd make your portfolio less diversified.
If you still have doubt, why don't you compare your backtest result with your live test. Just make sure you set same start date between backtest and forward test.
I've already told so many times that our EAs are still on early development. It may be far from perfect. Accussing us to use fake codes is just too much
If you think that our EAs is waste of time, then please don't waste your time here. So many "holy grail" EA to play in this forum.
Best regards.
autotradingportfolio
Active Member
- Credits
- 0
No, since the beginning, we already said that you might lose on your first month, even the EA name implies how the EA status is.
Our EAs is not profitable? Maybe yes, we can't guarantee it's performance, we already said it so many times.
But you accuse we use fake codes just because you got loss on your first two month, without any code related proof, that's different things and unacceptable.
Anyway, our EAs seems useless for you, just leave it okay? You're wasting your energy for this debate and this is not constructive at all, you're also wasting your time and vps resource for running our EAs, just use another EA which can guarantee monthly profit for you.
Then just stop using it and lose your money with bullshit bots instead! There is NO money
NO, it is not allowed.
People like you are not allowed to demand ANYTHING. Did you create anything useful?!? You are using genious code for FREE and hate about it. You simply did not understand how forex trading works in general. There is NO risk free money making machine here.
You are using a LONGTERM strategy with proven profitability. Your observed timeframe of two months is of nearly no use. Especially as the backtest show negative results for the time beeing as well.
So there is no problem with the code, the problem sits in front of your computer.
NO, it is not allowed.
People like you are not allowed to demand ANYTHING. Did you create anything useful?!? You are using genious code for FREE and hate about it. You simply did not understand how forex trading works in general. There is NO risk free money making machine here.
You are using a LONGTERM strategy with proven profitability. Your observed timeframe of two months is of nearly no use. Especially as the backtest show negative results for the time beeing as well.
So there is no problem with the code, the problem sits in front of your computer.
In fact not even that. Tests are needed only technical wise - like analysing potential error codes occuring or unexplainable trade opening/closing to ensure a smooth and reliable trading experience.
What you most likely mean is improving the performance by further tests. That is NOT necessary anymore based on my experience. You are only greedy as f*ck. PATIENCE is what you need here. Changing core mechanics will most likely only switch or change periods with profits and drawdown. There is no further increasing of the gain curve without increasing the drawdown on some other points of time as well I even would claim. Most people are looking for completely wrong and non realistic targets.
Dear autotradingportfolio,
I have seen the backtest posted few pages ago referring v1 v2 v4. But the currencies developed also in v4 the total results, I'm speaking in for gained, v1 taken more than latest version. I'm wrong or is it effectively so?
What should be better v4 respect v1 and v2?
Thanks a lot for your job!
I have seen the backtest posted few pages ago referring v1 v2 v4. But the currencies developed also in v4 the total results, I'm speaking in for gained, v1 taken more than latest version. I'm wrong or is it effectively so?
What should be better v4 respect v1 and v2?
Thanks a lot for your job!
Hi autotradingportfolio,
I've got a question for you...
You write that each pair can open 20 trades and there are 10 pairs. So, if each pair open 20 trades, that makes 200 open trades.
If you begin just with 0.01 fixed lot, with an account 10.000, that makes 2 lots = level 20, no ?
So, it seems to me that you need an account with more than 20.000 to stay in a reasonnable level (10).
Agree with me ?
Thanks
I've got a question for you...
You write that each pair can open 20 trades and there are 10 pairs. So, if each pair open 20 trades, that makes 200 open trades.
If you begin just with 0.01 fixed lot, with an account 10.000, that makes 2 lots = level 20, no ?
So, it seems to me that you need an account with more than 20.000 to stay in a reasonnable level (10).
Agree with me ?
Thanks
- Credits
- 0
This is not martingale EA, each OP has it's own technical analysis. So it's kind of like it hedge each other.
I agree
cho.steven
New Member
- Credits
- 0
This EA is very good i think.
Keep it up man
Keep it up man
autotradingportfolio
Active Member
- Credits
- 0
Hi Raffus
Maybe you mean the version 2.0, because this is the first version we release in this forum, we don't put the version number on the EA name.
Yes it's true that version 2.0 has higher System Quality Number (SQN is the standard value we use to measure the performance) than the later versions (version 3.0 and 4.0) based on backtest, if you read our previous posts, you'll know that version 3.0 and 4.0 are not the replacement for version 2.0/2.9, we use different approach for the later versions, the main difference is, it has fixed, visible hard SL and TP.
We develop version 3.0 and 4.0 because some members complaint the lack of SL and TP, In fact the version 2 has internal SL and TP mechanism that is not visible.
They also complaint for very long trading period and also the profit eating swap fees, we use no swap acount, so we have no problem with swap, but not all members can afford it.
While the version 2.0 has higher SQN, the later version has adventage too, it's easier to update thanks to it's fixed SL and TP.
Which one is better? we don't know, maybe version 2.0 or maybe version 3.0/4.0, or maybe both of them bad. It depends on your situation, will you able to withstand the very long trading period? Can you trade without SL and TP? Do you have a non swap account?
Best regards.
autotradingportfolio
Active Member
- Credits
- 0
Dear traders
These are rules you need to remember :
1. All of the results we present here are merely based on backtest, please don't overestimate the EA.
2. The backtest maybe inaccurate, the future result maybe worse, losses may occur.
3. We always suggest to backtest the EA before you forward test it, if you do FT, please use demo account first.
4. We can't guaraantee anything at all, you trade at your own risk, please never blame us for the loss.
5. If you still have doubt with this EA, please don't do anything with it, you'll only waste your time, energy, and computer resource for doing backtest or FT.
6. Please remember that, the only guaranteed method to avoid losses from this EA is by NOT using it.
Our apologies, by writing those rules we don't mean to be rude or arrogant, we just don't want to be blamed or moreover called as a scammer. You should now from the very beginning, forex trading is a risky bussiness.
Best regards and always keep your trades safe.
These are rules you need to remember :
1. All of the results we present here are merely based on backtest, please don't overestimate the EA.
2. The backtest maybe inaccurate, the future result maybe worse, losses may occur.
3. We always suggest to backtest the EA before you forward test it, if you do FT, please use demo account first.
4. We can't guaraantee anything at all, you trade at your own risk, please never blame us for the loss.
5. If you still have doubt with this EA, please don't do anything with it, you'll only waste your time, energy, and computer resource for doing backtest or FT.
6. Please remember that, the only guaranteed method to avoid losses from this EA is by NOT using it.
Our apologies, by writing those rules we don't mean to be rude or arrogant, we just don't want to be blamed or moreover called as a scammer. You should now from the very beginning, forex trading is a risky bussiness.
Best regards and always keep your trades safe.
autotradingportfolio
Active Member
- Credits
- 0
Hi Jean-Leon
Yes, if you're using 0.01 lot size, the maximum total lot size would be 2 lots or 200.000 unit, if your account is 10.000 then you need minimum 1:20 leverage which is quite low and still below ESMA limitation which is 1:30.
The EAs will unlikely open 20 trades at same time for all pairs, it's not grid EA afterall.
Please clarify if I miss your points here.
Go ahead sir big thanks