Question PeakTrough EA - Only 1% DD!

[kumar forex]

thank u verymuch Luizinho..i will try now....

 

[merlin1331]

hai merlin,
u r senior in this forum.u have tested lot of EA.i am new to this forum.because i lost somuch money in forex.i want to recover my lossing.please help me.can u suggest me a good profitable EA to me.advance thanks to u merlin friend.
this is my mail id:
[email protected]

see my comment

 

[miszigen]

Follows the EA with the default settings I used in the above test on 5 digit broker. Beware of the risk factor.
Good luck!

Thanks Luizinho really good work let's see how it go in forward test

 

[Altan]

Follows the EA with the default settings I used in the above test on 5 digit broker. Beware of the risk factor.
Good luck!

thanks Luizinho...Could add time filter or share source code(mq4)for to add time filter.
Regards.

 

[merlin1331]

i suggest everyone use luize versions ea to test , in order to see if it has good result and then to think about add time filter or others

 

[Altan]

i suggest everyone use luize versions ea to test , in order to see if it has good result and then to think about add time filter or others

this is a better approach

 

[garded]

Follows the EA with the default settings I used in the above test on 5 digit broker. Beware of the risk factor.
Good luck!

Great work

I don`t know if it is just me but I still can`t see that it trails stops...
Anyone having the same.

 

[miszigen]

If you mean the basic version I have the same problem.

 

[garded]

If you mean the basic version I have the same problem.

Yes I had, but tested Luizinho`s version and same problem there...

 

[miszigen]

Yes I had, but tested Luizinho`s version and same problem there...

very strange... i wonder why it works in backtest

 

[garded]

very strange... i wonder why it works in backtest

It does not work in backtest either. Does it work in your backtest?

 

[miszigen]

It does not work in backtest either. Does it work in your backtest?

In my statement it shows that EA takes 178 short won positions and 173 long won positions in year so i think it works both ways.

 

[garded]

In my statement it shows that EA takes 178 short won positions and 173 long won positions in year so i think it works both ways.

This is my tester with M5 and 0.1 lots after two days.... It is because it produces a cluster of pending sell orders and the price goes south and then it looks like a goldmine but it is pure luck because it could have taken the sell orders on a 20 pip trip and gone north again, blowing up the acc.

So you see that it don`t trail, then it should have been several smaller profits.. the trail here was set to 10.

 

[miszigen]

This is my tester with M5 and 0.1 lots after two days.... It is because it produces a cluster of pending sell orders and the price goes south and then it looks like a goldmine but it is pure luck because it could have taken the sell orders on a 20 pip trip and gone north again, blowing up the acc.

So you see that it don`t trail, then it should have been several smaller profits.. the trail here was set to 10.View attachment 15201

ah, ok you're right so it looks like we need someone to fix that problem and everything should be fine unfortunately i am not a coder.

 

[neo scalper]

From what I noticed the best results are in H1 and H4.
How is your optimization?
Look optimize from 08.01.2015 period, because in this period could not find a good result.
I changed the EA putting my management code of money and I will post below the result obtained without optimizing the EA.
H1 Medium Risk with 99.9% modeling:View attachment 15119
View attachment 15120

H4 High Risk with 99.9% modeling:

View attachment 15121
View attachment 15122

What pair you Backtest?

 

[garded]

Is there a kind coder here that could have a look at the trailing on this EA?
I have looked at the code but having no coding experience I could not see what is the problem

 

[Luizinho]

What pair you Backtest?

EURUSD
 

This is my tester with M5 and 0.1 lots after two days.... It is because it produces a cluster of pending sell orders and the price goes south and then it looks like a goldmine but it is pure luck because it could have taken the sell orders on a 20 pip trip and gone north again, blowing up the acc.

So you see that it don`t trail, then it should have been several smaller profits.. the trail here was set to 10.View attachment 15201

If your broker is 5 digits use 0.2 to 20 pips. See what is also StopLevel and adjust accordingly.
 

thanks Luizinho...Could add time filter or share source code(mq4)for to add time filter.
Regards.

i suggest everyone use luize versions ea to test , in order to see if it has good result and then to think about add time filter or others

I will enter this option and put once complete.

 

[garded]

If your broker is 5 digits use 0.2 to 20 pips. See what is also StopLevel and adjust accordingly.

I don`t think this is the problem as it trails on buy orders but not on sell. And there is adjustment for 5 digits in the code.

 

[Luizinho]

...
 

I don`t think this is the problem as it trails on buy orders but not on sell. And there is adjustment for 5 digits in the code.

Sorry, wrong when he said:
"If your broker is 5 digits use 0.2 to 20 pips. See what is Also StopLevel and adjust accordingly."
The correct use is 2.0 to 20 pips.
The code is adapted for Traders accustomed to 4 digits where the value of the pip is 0.0001.
 

Yes I had, but tested Luizinho`s version and same problem there...

very strange... i wonder why it works in backtest

I noticed that also had the same problem here and so I decided to replace the original code trailingstop for mine.
I took and I left running with EA configuration for broker of 5 digits. I not tested in 4 digits.
See further testing in H1 with default settings (very high risk):


H4 with default settings (very high risk):


Added new feature to enable expiration position.
Evaluate.

 

[Luizinho]

This is my review for this thread:
I have hope!