• Welcome back! Thank you for being a part of this Traders Community. Let's discuss and share :)
    Selamat datang kembali! Trimakasih telah menjadi bagian dari Komunitas Trader ini. Mari berdiskusi dan berbagi :)

Question PeakTrough EA - Only 1% DD!

Then you are using standart acc. type. If u wanna use this strategie you must use raw ecn acc. types.

I'm trading for a long time dilong. I have real accounts on many brokers.
If you are asking which one is the best? All brokers has some cons and pros.
I dont suggest someone trade with a broker not ethical.
But my best trading experience was with finfx. Extremely low slippages even volatility times. But spreads a little bit high.
Australian brokers like Ic markets, tickmill, go markets, globalprime, vantagefx etc... good brokers for small capitals.
FinPRO ecn is a rising star at the moment also and Vipro markets.
Also forex.com, fxcm and myfxchoise are good in average trade execution for big capitals.
Stay away from FXCC, FxPro, AAAFx, Yadix, InstaForex and AxiTrader. Big slippage brokers, big spreads etc.
Also if wanna trade with gold u must try ThinkForex. But not for other pairs.

I havent try a broker yet dont know how :Exness.
Somebody has an opinion for this broker please share with me.

wow... many thanks for your information SeizeTheDay
Your feedback is very useful for me to learn forex and choosing a broker.
always post your ideas and knowledge in this forum.
I pray for all of us to be successful.
Thanks SeizeTheDay celoooo Luizinho You are a the Best Trader :)
 
3.jpg 2.jpg An important hint using tickstory. Maybe you exported the data wrong. It comes with 3 pip stop level and 1.8 pip default spread.

You must change this parameters exactly like this otherwise your tests do not count!!
 
Last edited:
View attachment 19295 View attachment 19294 An important hint using tickstory. Maybe you exported the data wrong. It comes with 3 pip stop level and 1.8 pip default spread.

You must change this parameters exactly like this otherwise your tests do not count!!

Wait... I think that the spread must be set when exporting database to that the results could be close to REAL Account... Am I wrong? Which is the reason to run BT with zero spread and run in REAL Account with real spread? I think that the settings in BT have to be most close to reality as possible to be reproducible.
 

Attachments

  • 2016-05-10_19h48_19.jpg
    2016-05-10_19h48_19.jpg
    79.7 KB · Views: 199
I'll leave my opinion on the spread of BT 99.9%.
If you notice in EA I put a print for me to observe that the spread is actually being used in the test, why?
In my version if I end up opening the MT and go straight to test an EA in a PAR and TIMEFRAME I already have a database loaded with "read-only", I do not know why, but the MT always carries the test with spread 0 regardless of the value I place, for this reason I use the the print function. To work around this problem I do the following:
I open the MT, select the EA that will test, choose the Spread and here comes the secret, choose a pair whatever I do not have a database, squeegee a small test and then go to the test in the PAR and TIMEFRAME with spread now correct.
Notice if it happens to you or if there is only problem here my version. Look in the messages that the EA sends during the test if the spread will be correct according to that selected. The message looks like this: "SPREAD: 6" for example.
See and then share the results
 
I'll leave my opinion on the spread of BT 99.9%.
If you notice in EA I put a print for me to observe that the spread is actually being used in the test, why?
In my version if I end up opening the MT and go straight to test an EA in a PAR and TIMEFRAME I already have a database loaded with "read-only", I do not know why, but the MT always carries the test with spread 0 regardless of the value I place, for this reason I use the the print function. To work around this problem I do the following:
I open the MT, select the EA that will test, choose the Spread and here comes the secret, choose a pair whatever I do not have a database, squeegee a small test and then go to the test in the PAR and TIMEFRAME with spread now correct.
Notice if it happens to you or if there is only problem here my version. Look in the messages that the EA sends during the test if the spread will be correct according to that selected. The message looks like this: "SPREAD: 6" for example.
See and then share the results

Isso de não fixar o spread é problema do terminal novo... substitua o arquivo terminal.exe pela versão 920 do MT4 que esse problema de não identificar o spread acaba... e nos parâmetros de inicialização do MT4 nas configurações do Tickstory, adicione o parâmetro /skipupdate.
 

Attachments

  • 2016-05-10_19h48_19.jpg
    2016-05-10_19h48_19.jpg
    79.7 KB · Views: 195
  • 2016-05-10_20h53_39.jpg
    2016-05-10_20h53_39.jpg
    126.9 KB · Views: 185
  • 2016-05-10_20h54_15.jpg
    2016-05-10_20h54_15.jpg
    18.8 KB · Views: 190
In mt4 build 950 when you gonna test , first select open prices only and press start. When you finished select every tick press start you'll test your ea with the desired spread. This is not necessery for older mt4 vers.
In tickstory if you add spread to the raw price your ea never determinate the real open/close prices. Dont add spread in tickstory, use your desired spread in metatrader. Use RAW SPREAD. Thats how you gonna really test your ea.
 
I'm gonna ask you something else Luizinho and celooo my friends.

Can you reverse the paramaters? Buystop-->SellLimit ; SellStop-->BuyLimit

This can be used for small timeframes for buy from support and sell from resistance levels.
 
You could share your SetFile used in USD JPY?
I'm gonna ask you something else Luizinho and celooo my friends.

Can you reverse the paramaters? Buystop-->SellLimit ; SellStop-->BuyLimit

This can be used for small timeframes for buy from support and sell from resistance levels.
I will provide that inclusion and we'll see how it goes.
Attached a new improvement, now with Breakeven function.

UseBreakeven - enable or disable breakeven function
BEStartAt - how many points (plus spread) , from order open price, breakeven will start
BEStep - how many points (plus spread), from order open price, breakeven stop will be placed

Added UseTrailing too, to enable or disable trailing function.

I did not have time to test... i'm running a long optimization in another EA. Someone please run BT and leave a feedback.

Don't forget to adjust the parameters... it's not pre defined.

I like your idea, but the breakeven who created we have to predict the spread to generate the exact tie.
About "UseTrailingStop" in my new version had to not use, would be enough to leave the parameter "TrailingStop" to 0.
I have a breakeven function already deployed in EA where we inform the Commission in points if any, and how many actual billing points EA must change the StopLoss, already discounting commission, swap and the spread of the order, whatever it is.
I will insert the option to reverse the orders as SeizeTheDay friend suggested and post to test.
Do not take this as a confrontation because we are all seeking the same result. After we analyzed which will be ideal.
The following results today already with these changes (except for the reversal of positions).
I left EA with fixed plots at 0.01.

tempimage.png
 
Last edited:
Luizinho i've this message;

PeakTroughEA_Luizinho_V1.3 EURUSD,H1: ExpertRemove function called

Thanks for fast response to reverse.

I'm using the exact eu set for the jpy.
 

Attachments

  • Adsız.jpg
    Adsız.jpg
    89.4 KB · Views: 213
SeizeTheDay, the last time I test with real account, the effect is not good, I will to test the new version now! Do you have a real account test? If you have, tell me the result! Friend,
 
Still testing mostly demo, using different tf and different pairs. Tested couple days live result was ok, shared the last pages.
 
Here is a safe test for Luizinho's latest ver. 1.3 EURUSD H4 test. Safe and profitable. You can also use this settings for JPY, AUD, CAD, GBP etc low spread majors...

Adsız.jpg
 
您的测试模型质量为N / A,哈哈,最好请与佣金程序员的重要影响因素,朋友,模拟试验是不可靠的,而质量是模型的99%,我是在一个真正的考验小账,一个星期之后才能看到结果
 
Your test model quality is N/A, ha ha, it's best to please the programmer with commission the important influence factors, friends, simulation test is not reliable, while quality is 99% of the model, I was with the real test on A small account, after A week to see results
 
Yes its N/A but its Ducascopy tickdata. I'm testing with mt4 build 950 because of that we can not see %99. But its still will be the same and its %100 reliable.
 
Back
Top