Absolutely
Back in 2017...
https://forex-station.com/viewtopic.php?t=8423458
or 2008
https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/175938/page28
New EA EA_Garago - I - Pitagora
- Thread starter tanaka akiko
- Start date
Back in 2017...
https://forex-station.com/viewtopic.php?t=8423458
or 2008
https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/175938/page28
- Credits
- 11
- Credits
- 11
Dear Master Tanaka
Please find attached 2 Indicator source codes TMA CG MTF Non Repaint and another TMA Modified Never Repaint. Both of these are non repainting indicators and I have personally changed their settings and they do not repaint and you can try testing it on any chart M1 timeframe and you wont find any repainting. Tma True as suggested by other members is just crap and nothing apart from half length which gives multiple false signals at the same time. If we incorporate the following TMA CG MTF Non Repaint or TMA Modified Never Repaint with Garago Pitgora indicator you see the results in attached screenshots . Tanaka request you check both TMA CG MTF Non Repaint or TMA Modified Never Repaint indicators and decide to combine any one of the both indicator along with Garago Pitagora indicator(if you have other TMA Non repainting indicators then you can look to combine them with Garago Pitagora) and the EA takes entry when cross marks x appear in upper or lower band of channel and when Garago Pitagora signals appear there is double confirmation then the EA opens position and the EA closes position dynamically at certain TP or if you can add function for Auto TP. EA only takes Entry when Cross x marks appear in upper or lower bands channel and when there is only Long large signal Line __________ and ignore taking positions in small signal lines. Attached Chart Setups with examples. Master Tanaka we don't want simple TMA EA but Garago Pitgora with included TMA CG a combination Hybrid EA . Gentlemen kindly don't comment about repainting without doing trial with these indicators and submitting proof.
Please find attached 2 Indicator source codes TMA CG MTF Non Repaint and another TMA Modified Never Repaint. Both of these are non repainting indicators and I have personally changed their settings and they do not repaint and you can try testing it on any chart M1 timeframe and you wont find any repainting. Tma True as suggested by other members is just crap and nothing apart from half length which gives multiple false signals at the same time. If we incorporate the following TMA CG MTF Non Repaint or TMA Modified Never Repaint with Garago Pitgora indicator you see the results in attached screenshots . Tanaka request you check both TMA CG MTF Non Repaint or TMA Modified Never Repaint indicators and decide to combine any one of the both indicator along with Garago Pitagora indicator(if you have other TMA Non repainting indicators then you can look to combine them with Garago Pitagora) and the EA takes entry when cross marks x appear in upper or lower band of channel and when Garago Pitagora signals appear there is double confirmation then the EA opens position and the EA closes position dynamically at certain TP or if you can add function for Auto TP. EA only takes Entry when Cross x marks appear in upper or lower bands channel and when there is only Long large signal Line __________ and ignore taking positions in small signal lines. Attached Chart Setups with examples. Master Tanaka we don't want simple TMA EA but Garago Pitgora with included TMA CG a combination Hybrid EA . Gentlemen kindly don't comment about repainting without doing trial with these indicators and submitting proof.
Attachments
- Credits
- 11
- Credits
- 11
Attachments
- Credits
- 11
I was testing this strategy I found it very profitable to do it that way
Hello everyone's
I studied this robot(mgrid EA )for two months, there is no problem in terms of mathematics, but in general, two basic changes should be made in order to be always profitable.
First, in order not to face server order restrictions, buy stop and sell stop orders should be modified.
This means a lower order than the original robot
For example, when she hits the first levels, she places sell stop orders on the opposite side, but in this version, she has to add and modify the previous stop orders.
The second way to increase the profit and prevent the loss of this robot is that
Reducing the amount of the distance between the first two levels, that is, the first level of sell stop and the first level of bistop, without manipulating the distance between other levels
For example, we have set the increment to 100 points, so the distance between the first level of buy stop and sell stop will be 200 points, and the distance between the levels will be 100 points, but if this amount can be set to 50 points less, then the amount of loss will actually decrease. We have reduced it by 50 points, so it won't hurt in many collisions
View attachment 155691
Hello everyone's
I studied this robot(mgrid EA )for two months, there is no problem in terms of mathematics, but in general, two basic changes should be made in order to be always profitable.
First, in order not to face server order restrictions, buy stop and sell stop orders should be modified.
This means a lower order than the original robot
For example, when she hits the first levels, she places sell stop orders on the opposite side, but in this version, she has to add and modify the previous stop orders.
The second way to increase the profit and prevent the loss of this robot is that
Reducing the amount of the distance between the first two levels, that is, the first level of sell stop and the first level of bistop, without manipulating the distance between other levels
For example, we have set the increment to 100 points, so the distance between the first level of buy stop and sell stop will be 200 points, and the distance between the levels will be 100 points, but if this amount can be set to 50 points less, then the amount of loss will actually decrease. We have reduced it by 50 points, so it won't hurt in many collisions
View attachment 155691Attachments
Last edited:
Risk 81.000 for win 220.000 has no sense for me. Also a professional Expert advisor must be profitable in long run. 10 years minimun, if not, you are ready for lost your money...
Dear Master Tanaka,
This Indicator is Garago Pitgora Indicator given by Garagao which Garago shared in the first page post number five. I don't know if the indicator shared by Garago is the correct Garagao Pitgora indicator or not because since you don't recognise it I think it may be the wrong indicator. Kindly share the Garago Pitgora correct indicator that you have coded. And Master my sincere request to you Please combine Garago Pitgora Indicator and TMA Indicator and make a combined EA that takes confirmation from both Garago Pitgora Indicator and then TMA indicator and then opens a new trade position. Since you have already coded Garagao Pitgora EA and TMA EA then it should not take much time for you to code the combined Garago Pitgora with TMA combined EA. Many Thanks and you are the best always Master
Attachments
- Credits
- 11
Dear Master Tanaka,
This Indicator is Garago Pitgora Indicator given by Garagao which Garago shared in the first page post number five. I don't know if the indicator shared by Garago is the correct Garagao Pitgora indicator or not because since you don't recognise it I think it may be the wrong indicator. Kindly share the Garago Pitgora correct indicator that you have coded. And Master my sincere request to you Please combine Garago Pitgora Indicator and TMA Indicator and make a combined EA that takes confirmation from both Garago Pitgora Indicator and then TMA indicator and then opens a new trade position. Since you have already coded Garagao Pitgora EA and TMA EA then it should not take much time for you to code the combined Garago Pitgora with TMA combined EA. Many Thanks and you are the best always Master
This is the indi I used.
Alex Shankster
New Member
- Credits
- 0
Will test!
this text was not me who said it was a person from another forum I just reposted
- Credits
- 11
I added Sto filter
HELLO MASTER TANAKA, XAGUSD IS 110 PIPS DOWN AND XAUUSD ORDER IS 67 PIPS DOWN BUT EA IS NOT OPENING ANY NEW MARGINTALE HEDGING ORDER OF XAGUSD OR XAUUSD . MARGINTAKE WITH 2X MULTIPLE IS ON IN EA SETTINGS. PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED SET FILES USED AND CORRECT THE MISTAKE AS EA MUST OPEN ANOTHER HEDGING ORDER IN SAME OR DIFFRENT DIRECTION WHEN THE ORDER IS DOWN SO MANY PIPS
Attachments
- Credits
- 11
If you want Grid, please check here.
For XAUUSD, if you want 30pips Grid distance , please input 300.
Use Grid=true
Attachments
- Credits
- 11
Attachments
- Credits
- 0
In backtesting, it does not include the grid coverage when it is activated.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Thanks.
Attachments
- Credits
- 11
It is not grid.
if you use order distance , then you need to increase max positions and this function is used to add more orders but it needs signal as a trigger.
If you want to use Grid without signal (every xxxx pips ) , then you can use UseGrid=true.
Hello Master Tanaka,
Hope you are monitoring the Performance of the EA in the account currently.
These are the Setfiles I am using currently. Fixed 30 PIP new order open for Forex/XAG and 300 PIP new order open for XAUUSD and margintale function 2.0 and max margin tale orders 5. When a Trade is in Loss the EA opens a new position every fixed 30 pips. I want that when the first Trade is in Loss then EA opens new hedging position not on fixed pips but when the EA get Signal in same direction as first order it might be after 10 pips or 30 pips or 50 pips or 100 pips. How can I do it, kindly help to fix it. Then I will update the new EA with the required settings. Currently the old Garago EA is running and once I get the new settings from you then I will update and run the Garago EA with Stochastic filter.
Set files Attached please look into it and guide accordingly