• Welcome back! Thank you for being a part of this Traders Community. Let's discuss and share :)
    Selamat datang kembali! Trimakasih telah menjadi bagian dari Komunitas Trader ini. Mari berdiskusi dan berbagi :)

New EA ATA_EA (Beta Version)

HAL 9000 said:
Hello Pannik. By the correct technical point of view, you are right the Suite #1 was supposed to be the most efficient.
However, in the comparative tests that I have performed until now, the Suites #3 and #4 are leading the ranking of profitability.

I totally agree with you that these Suites are more sensitive to the market conditions, specially during high volatility days, when we have to adjust the parameters of the EA to avoid a situation in which the account reaches an irreversible DD, or a number of opened orders that achieves to the maximium acccepted by the account (specially when the account has the max limit of 200, an usual trading condition in many brokers).

As I am still in a stage of using only the Statical Type Progress Stepa Along this week, sometimes I was almost "driving" the EA during the European Session, adjusting the parameters in order to control the exposure. It had been a nice experience which is allowing me to understand the EA and gradually discover its limits.

Regards,
Click to expand...

Hello,
if You want to make more and easy test, You can get multicurrency version .
There is on my 'signature' place.
Best Regards.
 
Last edited:
pannik said:
Hello,
if You want to make more and easy test, You can get multicurrency version .
There is on my 'signature' place.
Best Regards.
Click to expand...

Thank you very much Pannik for sharing these fantastic EAs.
I believe that a high number of members of this Forum are also very grateful for the release of so much powerful EAs.
Also hope that many of the people that are doing tests, come here and share their valuable experiences.
 
pannik said:
Hello,
I have disigned expert to working like triangular arbitrage but make a grid of asymetric orders.
So, I think best suite is #1, this is correct suite from original idea (triangular arbitrage).
I 'm thinking suite #1 have less DD from other suites in long term.
With other suites if one pair moved faster, there is no way to control DD.
Best regards.
Click to expand...

Hi, do you mean that regarless of which pair we are using (1-4), we can use suite 1 for that 4 pairs?
example : eur usd chf using BSB SBS _1 for suite of orders?
 
The multicurrency version plows the market..... :giggle:
 

Attachments

  • ATA_EA-Multicurrency.PNG
    ATA_EA-Multicurrency.PNG
    1,023.8 KB · Views: 92
Pannik, just a question: In the ATA version 2.0 we don't have the parameter "SideOrders Trade" which was still available in the ATA 1.13.
Do you believe that it would it be possible to come back with this parameter in the future or, eventually it is not possible due to the mechanism for generating the MultiCurrecy Pairs of the ATA 2.0 ?

upload_2017-12-8_14-19-52.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-8_14-19-52.png
    upload_2017-12-8_14-19-52.png
    73.8 KB · Views: 368
Last edited:
HAL 9000 said:
Pannik, just a question: In the ATA version 2.0 we don't have the parameter "SideOrders Trade" which was still available in the ATA 1.13.
Do you believe that it would it be possible to come back with this parameter in the future or, eventually it is not possible due to the mechanism for generating the MultiCurrecy Pairs of the ATA 2.0 ?

View attachment 35717
Click to expand...
Hello,
I felt that this feature was superfluous and so I removed it from the latest version, but I will add it again.
Best Regards.
 
pannik said:
Hello,
I felt that this feature was superfluous and so I removed it from the latest version, but I will add it again.
Best Regards.
Click to expand...

Pannik, thank you very much for returning with the parameter.
At least for me, it is very useful, since it allows me, for example, to apply different configurations over the Plus side and the Minus side for a same Currency Pair (of course applying two EAs in two different graphs side by side).
This possibility of controlling the two sides independently allowed me to "save" a trading account which was in a very critical situatiion along this week... lol.

Best Regards,
Wish you have a VERY nice weekend.
 
Hi pannik, can you make a thread for discussing COUPLE HEDGE EA?
by the way, yesterday i got loss on my demo because of out of margin (4 pairs running plus minus + GEOMETRICAL progression for lot)
 
stevenvanlie said:
Hi pannik, can you make a thread for discussing COUPLE HEDGE EA?
by the way, yesterday i got loss on my demo because of out of margin (4 pairs running plus minus + GEOMETRICAL progression for lot)
Click to expand...
Hello,
I did thread for CoupleHedgeEA, but it was deleted by admins.
Using a geometric lot size is very dangerous for grid. Is better to use geometrical lot with geometrical step.
Best Regards.
 
pannik said:
Hello,
I did thread for CoupleHedgeEA, but it was deleted by admins.
Using a geometric lot size is very dangerous for grid. Is better to use geometrical lot with geometrical step.
Best Regards.
Click to expand...
Whether this ea also work like as martingale system with using geometric lot size
seems good for swing trading strategy using this ea isn`t
 
blackking said:
Whether this ea also work like as martingale system with using geometric lot size
seems good for swing trading strategy using this ea isn`t
Click to expand...
No, sir.
Default settings are to working with fixed lot size and fixed step orders.
But there are option to make lot and step geometrical (semi martingale) or exponential (pure martingale).
If the user want to test it, can to change progress type.
Best Regards.
 

Attachments

You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top