• Welcome back! Thank you for being a part of this Traders Community. Let's discuss and share :)
    Selamat datang kembali! Trimakasih telah menjadi bagian dari Komunitas Trader ini. Mari berdiskusi dan berbagi :)

New EA ATA_EA (Beta Version)

Ok friends let's get a little serious now with this great EA (ATA_1.13).

MyFxbook: ATA_1.13 Real

From this Monday we go in a real cent account to go more relaxed and with low risk.

As we move forward and see the negative floating we may go up to lower the price, what I want to keep this account with a very low risk.

Broker: FBS
Type of account: Cents
Initial Balance: $ 50,000
Groups (2): 3 and 4
Lot: 0.1
upload_2017-12-9_9-54-19.png upload_2017-12-9_9-55-1.png


We'll see what happens.

MyFxbook: ATA_1.13 Real

Note: I will remove the demo to leave more speed to the real one.

King Regards.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-9_9-54-19.png
    upload_2017-12-9_9-54-19.png
    49 KB · Views: 386
  • upload_2017-12-9_9-55-1.png
    upload_2017-12-9_9-55-1.png
    47.6 KB · Views: 382
Lucas Acosta said:
Ok friends let's get a little serious now with this great EA (ATA_1.13).

MyFxbook: ATA_1.13 Real

From this Monday we go in a real cent account to go more relaxed and with low risk.

As we move forward and see the negative floating we may go up to lower the price, what I want to keep this account with a very low risk.

Broker: FBS
Type of account: Cents
Initial Balance: $ 50,000
Groups (2): 3 and 4
Lot: 0.1
View attachment 35738 View attachment 35739


We'll see what happens.

MyFxbook: ATA_1.13 Real

Note: I will remove the demo to leave more speed to the real one.

King Regards.
Click to expand...
if i have that much to blow $500 that easy ill be rich in months trading the stupid forex :D
and as i said to lia its complicated everywhere anywhere :D i mean life in most

nice share
 
Lucas Acosta said:
Ok friends let's get a little serious now with this great EA (ATA_1.13).

MyFxbook: ATA_1.13 Real

From this Monday we go in a real cent account to go more relaxed and with low risk.

As we move forward and see the negative floating we may go up to lower the price, what I want to keep this account with a very low risk.

Broker: FBS
Type of account: Cents
Initial Balance: $ 50,000
Groups (2): 3 and 4
Lot: 0.1
View attachment 35738 View attachment 35739


We'll see what happens.

MyFxbook: ATA_1.13 Real

Note: I will remove the demo to leave more speed to the real one.

King Regards.
Click to expand...

Lucas,

Muchos Exitos.. pronto empezare en real tambien...
 
pannik said:
Hello,
I did thread for CoupleHedgeEA, but it was deleted by admins.
Using a geometric lot size is very dangerous for grid. Is better to use geometrical lot with geometrical step.
Best Regards.
Click to expand...
yes, i am switching the option to statical lot progression, i think its very dangerous, and does not give so much advantage using that geometric progression.
i am LIVE using ATA EA on pair 1. set 1

now also trying COUPLEHEDGE_EA starting $200, become $600 in 2 days in demo
 
Lucas Acosta said:
Ok friends let's get a little serious now with this great EA (ATA_1.13).

MyFxbook: ATA_1.13 Real

From this Monday we go in a real cent account to go more relaxed and with low risk.

As we move forward and see the negative floating we may go up to lower the price, what I want to keep this account with a very low risk.

Broker: FBS
Type of account: Cents
Initial Balance: $ 50,000
Groups (2): 3 and 4
Lot: 0.1
View attachment 35738 View attachment 35739


We'll see what happens.

MyFxbook: ATA_1.13 Real

Note: I will remove the demo to leave more speed to the real one.

King Regards.
Click to expand...
Thank you for sharing thes amonut and lot equal 500$ and lot = 0.01 ?
 
pannik said:
No, sir.
Default settings are to working with fixed lot size and fixed step orders.
But there are option to make lot and step geometrical (semi martingale) or exponential (pure martingale).
If the user want to test it, can to change progress type.
Best Regards.
Click to expand...

pannik, regarding the parameter "Type of Progress Step", would you please describe to us the difference between the three options (statical, geometrical and exponential) ?

when we change from "statical step" to "geometrical step", which are the variables that influence the increase of the STEP ? the number of opened orders, for example ?
 
El Zorro
Hello

"Type of Progress Step" influence number of opened orders.

Statical is: 'Target Open Next Order (The value is $ per lot)' lf value is 50, for all next orders the step is 50.
Geometrical is: 'Target Open Next Order (The value is $ per lot)' if value is 50, for first next the step is 50, for second next 100, for third next 150, for fourth next 200 eg..
Exponential is: 'Target Open Next Order (The value is $ per lot)' if value is 50, for first next the step is 50, for second next 100, for third next 200, for fourth next 400 eg..

Example:
If we have a distance 1600 units,
with statical step 50 units, we have 20 points (like orders).
with geometrical step 50 units, we have 7.5 points (like orders).
with exponential step 50 units, we have 5.05 points (like orders).
 
Last edited:
pannik said:
El Zorro
Hello

"Type of Progress Step" influence number of opened orders.

Statical is: 'Target Open Next Order (The value is $ per lot)' lf value is 50, for all next orders the step is 50.
Geometrical is: 'Target Open Next Order (The value is $ per lot)' if value is 50, for first next the step is 50, for second next 100, for third next 150, for fourth next 200 eg..
Exponential is: 'Target Open Next Order (The value is $ per lot)' if value is 50, for first next the step is 50, for second next 100, for third next 200, for fourth next 400 eg..

Example:
If we have a distance 1600 units,
with statical step 50 units, we have 20 points (like orders).
with geometrical step 50 units, we have 7.5 points (like orders).
with exponential step 50 units, we have 5.05 points (like orders).
Click to expand...
pannik, thank you for your clear explanation. i understand that the cuurent ea version dont permit the user to adjust the proportion of the increase of the step.
just an idea, perhaps in the future it would be interesting to include a parameter to control it. regards.
 
Lucas Acosta said:
Ok friends let's get a little serious now with this great EA (ATA_1.13).

MyFxbook: ATA_1.13 Real

From this Monday we go in a real cent account to go more relaxed and with low risk.

As we move forward and see the negative floating we may go up to lower the price, what I want to keep this account with a very low risk.

Broker: FBS
Type of account: Cents
Initial Balance: $ 50,000
Groups (2): 3 and 4
Lot: 0.1
View attachment 35738 View attachment 35739


We'll see what happens.

MyFxbook: ATA_1.13 Real

Note: I will remove the demo to leave more speed to the real one.

King Regards.
Click to expand...
Do not forget to place the maximum number of orders the expert can open
In FBS the cent account went from 100 to 200 positions
Therefore 100 positions for each of the charts
Do not forget that you have limit of positions
Except for the account that is unlimited
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    20.1 KB · Views: 72
Alecksey said:
Do not forget to place the maximum number of orders the expert can open
In FBS the cent account went from 100 to 200 positions
Therefore 100 positions for each of the charts
Do not forget that you have limit of positions
Except for the account that is unlimited
Click to expand...
Which version ?
 
Alecksey said:
Do not forget to place the maximum number of orders the expert can open
In FBS the cent account went from 100 to 200 positions
Therefore 100 positions for each of the charts
Do not forget that you have limit of positions
Except for the account that is unlimited
Click to expand...
Hi, Thanks.

FBS accept to 200 open order in cent account.

Regards.
 
Number of orders from some brokers I know
Fxpro = 100 orders
Swissquote = 1000 orders
FBS = 200 orders (cent account)
IC Markets = 200 orders
Activtrades = 500 orders
I have a good program that later I will leave the link for anyone who wants to follow for free
But it works fine on ICMarkets
I did a comparison and ICMarkets despite charging commission and swap the result in general is better than the FBS
You may have swap-free FBS broker
Just talk to the people there.
It follows my state of almost 4 months
 

Attachments

You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top