- Credits
- 0
this is not correct code the correct code is big and has lot of classes...this is just scam that is being distributed on telegram to delude pplI have this but it has errors...if anyone can fix it.
this is not correct code the correct code is big and has lot of classes...this is just scam that is being distributed on telegram to delude pplI have this but it has errors...if anyone can fix it.
bang ini EA nya bisa di Backtest ga?This my contribution in soehoe community
Full unlock mt4 1421+
https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/118164?source=Site+Market+MT4+Expert+Rating006
this is not the correct src code....please anyone who has correct src code share it and i will try to fix the bugs if present
I use this EA for both my real account and my demo account. The real account on VPS and the demo account on my laptop will open positions in opposite positions. If the EA uses indicators to open positions, they should be in the same direction. Obviously not, but still The connection speeds of the accounts I put in the VPS are all within 3 milliseconds, and the speed of the laptop is about more than 200 milliseconds. The probability of staggering the position of the simulated account is very high, so what you said is not impossible. I don’t know the program, so I just I share my experience with you here.modifying code is development task but to reverse engineer a code that is protected by vmprotect needs different experience that involves divirtualization, unpacking and decompiling and so on....this is different from just writing and debugging code.
For the logic, I really want to know if they use the deep learning model they mentioned or not. I doubt they use deep learning since it will need more processing time than what i observe. Besides, ideally it needs opencl to run which was not needed in the testing. If deep learning is used, then it is hard to know the logic of the ea without seeing the input descriptors.
The sentiment message from the bot is useless as said before. Just random message.The drastic increase in lot size should save the trade. I have also done BT with this setting, often the account was down quickly. This only works in theory.
I have a different problem. I have the EA running on a demo account. (Roboforex demo) and on two separate live accounts. Although the sentiment was bullish, a short trade was opened. This went negative twice in a short time. I did not have these trades on my live accounts (Tickmill).
I therefore have doubts about the broker Roboforex.
With all due respect, do not take this message seriously. This EA is working well and the strategy seems to be good, but this EA has NO AI. Believing this is asking to be scammed.
This EA is based on 2 indicators, nothing more. It does not have AI because the cost of doing so is too high.
See attached screenshot so you can see that the author only included commands as a way to make buyers think that everything is being done by AI, but that's just random market sentiment.
If, as you say, this EA has many shortcomings, is it better not to use it? Your suggestion?The sentiment message from the bot is useless as said before. Just random message.
I saw that many people in other forums that had the same wrong selling entry and this is certainly because of the broker. If you look closely, this EA has volatility-sensitive strategies, which many brokers can easily manipulate to trigger EA orders or hit Stop Loss. At the brokerage I use (ICMarkets) this sell order was not triggered.
Unfortunately, we have the first proof that the risks increase in relation to this EA for this reason.
I'm not saying stop using it. I'm just saying that it seems like the risks are increasing as this EA becomes popular. What happened today with different results depending on the broker had not happened before. And if a broker uses its algorithm to understand massive behavior and wants to manipulate it, that is possible.If, as you say, this EA has many shortcomings, is it better not to use it? Your suggestion?
thanks for your replyI'm not saying stop using it. I'm just saying that it seems like the risks are increasing as this EA becomes popular. What happened today with different results depending on the broker had not happened before. And if a broker uses its algorithm to understand massive behavior and wants to manipulate it, that is possible.
Please tell me if an EA hides the stop profit and stop loss points, will it be less likely to be manipulated by the broker?I'm not saying stop using it. I'm just saying that it seems like the risks are increasing as this EA becomes popular. What happened today with different results depending on the broker had not happened before. And if a broker uses its algorithm to understand massive behavior and wants to manipulate it, that is possible.
Please tell me if an EA hides the stop profit and stop loss points, will it be less likely to be manipulated by the broker?
Thank you for your enlightenmentYou can change SL and TP with another EA, such as account-protector. But the focus is on the EA's strategy, on the buy or sell order, and you cannot change this from the EA.
The EAs that will have an advantage in this situations are those that are not popular and those that use average prices to close their positions (such as grid/marti EAs).
What I'm talking about here is a possibility, not a certainty. Hope that everything that happened today is just an "accident". Bye!
your level is too high, he can't open recoveryThe drastic increase in lot size should save the trade. I have also done BT with this setting, often the account was down quickly. This only works in theory.
I have a different problem. I have the EA running on a demo account. (Roboforex demo) and on two separate live accounts. Although the sentiment was bullish, a short trade was opened. This went negative twice in a short time. I did not have these trades on my live accounts (Tickmill).
I therefore have doubts about the broker Roboforex.