• Welcome back! Thank you for being a part of this Traders Community. Let's discuss and share :)
    Selamat datang kembali! Trimakasih telah menjadi bagian dari Komunitas Trader ini. Mari berdiskusi dan berbagi :)

Suggestion 100% win rate of 2 years Scalping System of Anna Baskakova

ztony said:
The algorithm of work is as follows :
1. Look at SSRC (this is the main indicator for the mini-trend... where it is directed in that direction and open orders)
2. Look where the channel (track) i-Regr-alert is directed and where the current price is (above - in the middle or below)
3. Look at H1 stochastic - where it is directed and where it is (oversold zone or overbought zone)
4. H1 - camarilla we determine where the price is (the price during the day always tends to the level *Pivot*)
5. i-Regr-alert look where the price is below or above
6. M1 we look at the stochastic (it is now in the oversold zone)
7. and on the channel i-Regr-alert - we make an accurate entry into the position, open an order based on H4 - H1 where the mini-trend is directed in that direction and work

I need conditions to write EA
Buy：1)
2)

Sell: 1)
2)

Exit：...
Click to expand...

Apart from the conditions above, we are asked to look at some of the VERY IMPORTANT comments by the developer within the workflow process. For example how the indicators work and do not work....eg..

Indicators:
super-signals ,JJN-Bee Indicators work together - when they are directed differently, they don’t work.
JJNBee, SuperSignals and Dserg are auxiliary indicators. arrow indicators are just an addition to the Trading System..... etc etc"

Regarding writing an EA - Its really fantastic to hear that you are going to write an EA for Anna's system. I think that is a great project and a good idea! There are some old EAs running for many years for trading EURUSD with settings and a high winning rate and low DD. A typical old EA for eurusd has performance like the following for comparison purposes.

upload_2025-1-13_0-45-37.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2025-1-13_0-45-37.png
    upload_2025-1-13_0-45-37.png
    268.3 KB · Views: 643
Last edited:
dascore said:
Apart from the conditions above, we are asked to look at some of the VERY IMPORTANT comments by the developer within the workflow process. For example how the indicators work and do not work....eg..

Indicators:
super-signals ,JJN-Bee Indicators work together - when they are directed differently, they don’t work.
JJNBee, SuperSignals and Dserg are auxiliary indicators. arrow indicators are just an addition to the Trading System..... etc etc"

Regarding writing an EA - Its really fantastic to hear that you are going to write an EA for Anna's system. I think that is a great project and a good idea! There are some old EAs running for many years for trading EURUSD with settings and a high winning rate and low DD. A typical old EA for eurusd has performance like the following for comparison purposes.

View attachment 167037
Click to expand...

How's been your results with this system? 100% win rate?

I can also code, an indicator to draw an arrow when all conditions meet or an ea, rules are not very clear though...
 
wei wong said:
How's been your results with this system? 100% win rate?

I can also code, an indicator to draw an arrow when all conditions meet or an ea, rules are not very clear though...
Click to expand...

I discovered it is possible to obtain a 100% win rate for the individual trading session eg London and New York sessions to trade EURUSD by NOT using all the indicators in the M1 template- ie every trader has to work with the templates provided to customise to his or her own preferences and trading style.

Otherwise, to have a 100% win rate over a long period of time would be very hard and require the trader to have a huge capital fund to allow open positions to be held over long periods of floating DD.

I would prefer a high winning rate of over 90% but small DD and not necessarily a 100% win rate....but then it is every trader's own preferences

Its good to know you can code EAs. I'm sure your skill will be very useful to this forum, cheers
 
Last edited:
I purchased Anna Baskakova's strategy training and she expressed it very confusingly, and it was very subjective and arbitrary, 100% of the win rate came from the oversized DD, and her strategy was not suitable for writing as an EA I don't think it's worth the time to study and learn Gave up
 
ztony said:
I purchased Anna Baskakova's strategy training and she expressed it very confusingly, and it was very subjective and arbitrary, 100% of the win rate came from the oversized DD, and her strategy was not suitable for writing as an EA I don't think it's worth the time to study and learn Gave up
Click to expand...

To complate the strategy by Anna Baskaskova was sent by Lime88, is it possible you share how the strategy should be run?
Perhaps you have such a written hand out for this strategy
 
loverhh said:
dascore how is your test ongoing? thx in advance
Click to expand...
Hi loverhh,

I tested the system for two weeks and below are my personal findings and opinions. They may not be representative for anyone else.

1. 1oo% consistent win rate? Answer- Yes and No, in other words it depends. My personal finding is that there is a lot of technical experience required to execute the trading in the way that the developer uses as the 6 indicators employed require discretionary decisions at every point of the trading.
2. High consistent win rate? Yes, it is possible to achieve a high consistent win rate by using just 2 of the non repainting indicators out of the 6 and the style of the trading is SCALPING as opposed to swing trading. For swing trading the H4 template is very useful.
3. Can the system be put into an EA? - The entire system requires a lot of input that is discretionary to achieve a 100% win rate. However it is definately possible to take the 2 non repainting indicators that represents the core of the system for SCALPING and develop an EA to produce consistent high win rate over 85-100%.
4. Can you drain your entire account with the system? Yes, with all discretionary trading systems, it is possible to bust your trading account and drain it to zero especially during news time and volatile periods. That is why the trader requires a big capital to hold the positions to allow the trades to get back into the trend and to be able to break even or to gain a profit.

This is a system that merit checking and testing esp. for scalpers. Adopting some of the indicators esp the non repainting ones will help improve accuracy and consistent winning rates.

Since there are only 6 indicators, I would suggest for those interested to study the system and play around testing the indicators and to demo trade the system using the 3 templates to find out for themselves how the system works and what indicators are non repainting etc etc.

Cheers, may the best prices be yours.

PS. I concur with member ztony that the system requires discretionary input from the trader and requires time and effort to learn to be able to use it to the level of the developer. In testing, I had input from member ztony, and acknowledge his help when I was testing the system. Thanks, ztony.
 
Last edited:
dascore said:
Hi loverhh,

I tested the system for two weeks and below are my personal findings and opinions. They may not be representative for anyone else.

1. 1oo% consistent win rate? Answer- Yes and No, in other words it depends. My personal finding is that there is a lot of technical experience required to execute the trading in the way that the developer uses as the 6 indicators employed require discretionary decisions at every point of the trading.
2. High consistent win rate? Yes, it is possible to achieve a high consistent win rate by using just 2 of the non repainting indicators out of the 6 and the style of the trading is SCALPING as opposed to swing trading. For swing trading the H4 template is very useful.
3. Can the system be put into an EA? - The entire system requires a lot of input that is discretionary to achieve a 100% win rate. However it is definately possible to take the 2 non repainting indicators that represents the core of the system for SCALPING and develop an EA to produce consistent high win rate over 85-100%.
4. Can you drain your entire account with the system? Yes, with all discretionary trading systems, it is possible to bust your trading account and drain it to zero especially during news time and volatile periods. That is why the trader requires a big capital to hold the positions to allow the trades to get back into the trend and to be able to break even or to gain a profit.

This is a system that merit checking and testing esp. for scalpers. Adopting some of the indicators esp the non repainting ones will help improve accuracy and consistent winning rates.

Since there are only 6 indicators, I would suggest for those interested to study the system and play around testing the indicators and to demo trade the system using the 3 templates to find out for themselves how the system works and what indicators are non repainting etc etc.

Cheers, may the best prices be yours.

PS. I concur with member ztony that the system requires discretionary input from the trader and requires time and effort to learn to be able to use it to the level of the developer. In testing, I had input from member ztony, and acknowledge his help when I was testing the system. Thanks, ztony.
Click to expand...


It's an honor to work with you
 
dascore said:
Hi loverhh,

I tested the system for two weeks and below are my personal findings and opinions. They may not be representative for anyone else.

1. 1oo% consistent win rate? Answer- Yes and No, in other words it depends. My personal finding is that there is a lot of technical experience required to execute the trading in the way that the developer uses as the 6 indicators employed require discretionary decisions at every point of the trading.
2. High consistent win rate? Yes, it is possible to achieve a high consistent win rate by using just 2 of the non repainting indicators out of the 6 and the style of the trading is SCALPING as opposed to swing trading. For swing trading the H4 template is very useful.
3. Can the system be put into an EA? - The entire system requires a lot of input that is discretionary to achieve a 100% win rate. However it is definately possible to take the 2 non repainting indicators that represents the core of the system for SCALPING and develop an EA to produce consistent high win rate over 85-100%.
4. Can you drain your entire account with the system? Yes, with all discretionary trading systems, it is possible to bust your trading account and drain it to zero especially during news time and volatile periods. That is why the trader requires a big capital to hold the positions to allow the trades to get back into the trend and to be able to break even or to gain a profit.

This is a system that merit checking and testing esp. for scalpers. Adopting some of the indicators esp the non repainting ones will help improve accuracy and consistent winning rates.

Since there are only 6 indicators, I would suggest for those interested to study the system and play around testing the indicators and to demo trade the system using the 3 templates to find out for themselves how the system works and what indicators are non repainting etc etc.

Cheers, may the best prices be yours.

PS. I concur with member ztony that the system requires discretionary input from the trader and requires time and effort to learn to be able to use it to the level of the developer. In testing, I had input from member ztony, and acknowledge his help when I was testing the system. Thanks, ztony.
Click to expand...
thx my friend for your detailled explanation and report... :) how always.. when you do your homework.. you do it properly :) thx again
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top