Suggestion Xpert Ea
- Thread starter newsfarda
- Start date
Lets make up for lost time with this EA.
- Credits
- 0
Is this work in real account also
- Credits
- 0
Shankar4567
Member
- Credits
- 0
Can you test it in 15M time frame?
- Credits
- 0
- Credits
- 0
What setting u used bro?
test in M1 time frame...
very good EA ...
Shankar4567
Member
- Credits
- 0
What setting you used?
Shankar4567
Member
- Credits
- 0
Thanks
Try max order = 1 , do not be greedy, American broker keep you safe
You are against this EA for some reason. It has Stop Loss, Martingales usually do not use one. I am not saying this EA is the answer but it's working on live accounts you have to give it a look.
They say it reads history but it is doing ok in live testing. I wonder what logic it uses ? It would have to be good to use 50 stop loss.
[QUOTE = "Clifford, post: 364860, membre: 65010"] Ils disent que ça lit l'histoire mais ça se passe bien dans les tests en direct. Je me demande quelle logique il utilise? Il faudrait être bon d'utiliser 50 stop loss. [/ QUOTE]
can you share your version XPERT with setting working live thanks
can you share your version XPERT with setting working live thanks
The version I have is not working on Demo. Does anybody have better unlimited version. Maybe it is my broker. The EA says dependencies. String error description(int).
Where can you buy the real version ?
- Credits
- 0
This EA read history in 4H TF and used in lower timeframe then show great result but in the real open many orders in opposite trend, if your balance 1000$ and hit SL 50 pip in default setting means 70*5$=350$ ---> 35% loses of each SL hit.
you can't never backtest in 4H TF because the expert cannot use the data at the same time and take the position, for this reason the expert uses kernel32.dll to read 4H TF information before backtest to deceive you.
This Expert is SCAM
you can't never backtest in 4H TF because the expert cannot use the data at the same time and take the position, for this reason the expert uses kernel32.dll to read 4H TF information before backtest to deceive you.
This Expert is SCAM