[QUOTE = "oshaban, post: 194721, member: 6247"] Oh, amigo ... Largo correo electrónico sin idioma común (inglés) ...
Traducir significa que muchas cosas no se entenderán bien.
Haré todo lo posible para responder en la primera oportunidad, en resumen, para no hacer que las cosas se pierdan entre líneas. [/ QUOTE]
Excuse me, it has not been translated correctly ... I'll put it back
Hello again, they were. Thank you for responding and doing it when documenting some details, that was not the intention you were looking for.
Well, you say that your EA is not martingale, but that's only because the EA does not close the losing position ... like the vast majority of EAs of the same type ... But what is the difference? I do not see any, it's more ... it does not close the losses, it implies more risk, because the next entry that doubles or triples the previous one, requires more margin and this adds to the one that has already been used by the first or second operation that still It is active and negative. That said, the essence of the system is the same.
About the link that you averaged and what you say you use, you should check how reliable that indicator is, so that the negotiation takes place in that pair, averaging whether it is effective or not. And have a guarantee and a successful success rate ...
For me, with my experience in forex and the strategies that I have followed, in manual, there are two things; when an operation is opened, it is because it has studied the statistical advantage of that strategy, pattern or any other thing, for which this exchange has been carried out, ... if it reaches the point that the SL touches, it is possible to return to do another operation, since the price has changed and will not always be in our favor at the first moment, and if this second time does not come out, it is because the employer fails, and we have to analyze again. If, on the other hand, another one opens in the same direction, it is that it is not facing that it has made an error and another one is added. If this time is correct, it is not because the system has worked. It's because he's been lucky ..
About giving or advising the configuration or a correct configuration, to learn, has not been resolved. I understand your point of view but I do not share the opinion. Although, as he says, he does not like that nobody loses his account, he should help in that, because more than one will lose it, because it will not work with a correct configuration, since you see, (as I also tell you and you have not given me an answer to that) that you put as a sample a small and standard account of only $ 500 and get a profit, but advise a minimum of $ 100 and a hundred. Something that I see contradictory.
I am also very happy that he is working on another great project, and that he is doing well in his surgical intervention.
About the other filters, keep them in mind, when you can and can, it was only a reflection and I think it is something important to better automate what an EA is, I do not agree with being always aware of the market. or the EA ... It would not make sense to call it EA, if you have to do manual closings and be aware of it. I only understand that I am aware of cases like this type of strategy, that they need to change the TF in which they move to avoid having more risks in front of events or disconnecting directly. The rest should work alone. That is the concept of EA (automate any strategy) And with the filters that comment, news, schedules, days and daily gains, it is very positive.
And again, thank you very much for making the decision to offer the latest version of EA Grid-Averager-PRO without restrictions.
Es un detalle y dice mucho sobre ti.