• Welcome back! Thank you for being a part of this Traders Community. Let's discuss and share :)
    Selamat datang kembali! Trimakasih telah menjadi bagian dari Komunitas Trader ini. Mari berdiskusi dan berbagi :)

Suggestion Heiken and Keltner Based EA - Backtesters

It seems modelling quality for this test is N/A
It is 99.99% from Tickstory. It shows "n/a" because I did not start the MT4 with the Tickstory program.
And here is the year 2017 (It rises from November 2017):
keltner2017.png
 

Attachments

  • keltner2017.png
    keltner2017.png
    119.6 KB · Views: 18
It is 99.99% from Tickstory. It shows "n/a" because I did not start the MT4 with the Tickstory program.
And here is the year 2017 (It rises from November 2017):
View attachment 104977
Thanks for your valuable Time. Do you have any suggestions to improve and why such down fall in the profit curve ? Also, I am testing it on live real account. Lets see, sometimes, the real performance is different from the backtesting performance.
 
Thanks for your valuable Time. Do you have any suggestions to improve and why such down fall in the profit curve ? Also, I am testing it on live real account. Lets see, sometimes, the real performance is different from the backtesting performance.
Yes, backtests sometimes differ from forward tests. In this case ist seems to be difficult to improve because the last two years have excellent profit. You can't see into the future.
 
Yes, backtests sometimes differ from forward tests. In this case ist seems to be difficult to improve because the last two years have excellent profit. You can't see into the future.

The longer a backtesing is done, the better the statistical statement is whether the EA will deliver good results in the future.
 
Back
Top