• Welcome back! Thank you for being a part of this Traders Community. Let's discuss and share :)
    Selamat datang kembali! Trimakasih telah menjadi bagian dari Komunitas Trader ini. Mari berdiskusi dan berbagi :)

New EA CoreX G V1.6 MT4

yohmi said:
I fixed the lot size and changed the trading risk, but the results were the same.
I may be misunderstanding something, so if you have any backtest results, please share them with me.
Click to expand...
My bad , yes results are same . In fixed
 
yohmi said:
I fixed the lot size and changed the trading risk, but the results were the same.
I may be misunderstanding something, so if you have any backtest results, please share them with me.
Click to expand...

You can set up and conduct tests in this manner.
 

Attachments

  • 20250104145918.png
    20250104145918.png
    61.8 KB · Views: 197
Corex is profitable. But we need to know ADP 2 OR 3. which is safe also need to make steady profits

All the settings are tuned for gold.
 
Last edited:
Jseid said:
Corex is profitable. But we need to know ADP 2 OR 3. which is safe also need to make steady profits

All the settings are tuned for gold.
Click to expand...
ADP1:

- Can have multiple trades at the same time

- Has the highest SL and highest TP

- Most risky, but also makes the most profit (also the biggest loss of the 3 when the stop loss is reached)

ADP2:

- Can only have 1 trade at a time

- Has lower SL than ADP1 but also the lowest TP

- Is not quite as risky to lose as ADP1

ADP3:

- Can have multiple trades at the same time

- Has the lowest SL and “middle” TP, which is adaptive

- The risk of loss here is lower than with ADP1, but can be higher than with ADP2 if several trades are open
 
yohmi said:
Since I want to test whether risk level affects trading, automatic-lotsize needs to be false.
I believe that risk level only affects lot size.
Click to expand...
I understand what you mean, but after the risk test, in live trading, I believe this parameter still needs to be set to true in order to most effectively utilize the margin for profitable trades. Is that correct?
 
potatoh said:
I understand what you mean, but after the risk test, in live trading, I believe this parameter still needs to be set to true in order to most effectively utilize the margin for profitable trades. Is that correct?
Click to expand...
I just want to find out if risk level affects trading.
 
The real account of the inventor of the EA, which is published on the MQL website, also started trading at the same time, synchronized with my testing.
 

Attachments

  • 20250105180155.png
    20250105180155.png
    141.5 KB · Views: 184
potatoh said:
ADP1:

- Can have multiple trades at the same time

- Has the highest SL and highest TP

- Most risky, but also makes the most profit (also the biggest loss of the 3 when the stop loss is reached)

ADP2:

- Can only have 1 trade at a time

- Has lower SL than ADP1 but also the lowest TP

- Is not quite as risky to lose as ADP1

ADP3:

- Can have multiple trades at the same time

- Has the lowest SL and “middle” TP, which is adaptive

- The risk of loss here is lower than with ADP1, but can be higher than with ADP2 if several trades are open
Click to expand...

What you can also do is assign a separate copy of the EA for each strategy (ADP1, ADP2, ADP3, etc.), attaching them to different charts. Just make sure to assign a unique magic number for each copy of the EA to avoid conflicts in trade management
 
In my pov ,APD 2 is safer and making steady profits. APD3 need to have higher win rate closer to 90% to match the loss, i can see pattern after 5 or above trade apd 3 is failing.

Big lot size with small risk Is better...
 
Last edited:
I created this for myself, so it's in Japanese, but it's a backtest result for a non-optimized period.
I stopped the EA because it was over-optimized.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top