What I meant is the combination of 4 or 5 pairs
see the attachment please
New EA ATA_EA (Beta Version)
- Thread starter pannik
- Start date
see the attachment please
In order to make a profit on an operation the value of the sale must be greater than the purchase
Example
If I buy something at 5 and seeing 6 then we have 4 types of referential
In assembling the operation
The purchase divided by the sale must be less than 1 => 5/6
I can also say that the purchase minus the sale should be less than 1 => 5-6
I can also say that the sale minus the purchase must be greater than 1 => 6-5
I can also say that the sale divided by the purchase must be greater than 1 => 6/5
In disassembly
The sale divided by the purchase must be greater than 1 => 6/5
I can also say that the sale minus the purchase is greater than 1 => 6-5
I can also say that the purchase minus the sale should be less than 1 => 5-6
I can also say that the purchase divided by the sale must be less than 1 => 5/6
To facilitate we adopt only two of the top
In assembling the operation
The purchase divided by the sale must be less than 1
When disassembling the operation
The sale divided by the purchase must be greater than 1
This is what we call FPI
Note: nothing has kept me from saying that in the assembly the value must be less than 1 and the disassembly should also be less than 1
It might seem incoherent
But it is not
If my referral for disassembly is from the purchase I made
I can disassemble the operation with the criterion that the value of the purchase divided by the value of the sale must be less than 1 also
It would be correct too
Why did you say all this?
To understand that you do not have to worry about complex calculations
If we assemble a given ring so that they all cancel at the end
If I have 3 pairs
If the product of them at any given moment is smaller than the other that cancels the operation is when we must make the operation
So if I have 4 pairs
The product of 3 of them must be smaller than the last one in the assembly
In this case we set up the operation
So if I have 4 pairs
The product of 3 of them must be smaller than the last one
In this case we must make the operation
Example
If I buy something at 5 and seeing 6 then we have 4 types of referential
In assembling the operation
The purchase divided by the sale must be less than 1 => 5/6
I can also say that the purchase minus the sale should be less than 1 => 5-6
I can also say that the sale minus the purchase must be greater than 1 => 6-5
I can also say that the sale divided by the purchase must be greater than 1 => 6/5
In disassembly
The sale divided by the purchase must be greater than 1 => 6/5
I can also say that the sale minus the purchase is greater than 1 => 6-5
I can also say that the purchase minus the sale should be less than 1 => 5-6
I can also say that the purchase divided by the sale must be less than 1 => 5/6
To facilitate we adopt only two of the top
In assembling the operation
The purchase divided by the sale must be less than 1
When disassembling the operation
The sale divided by the purchase must be greater than 1
This is what we call FPI
Note: nothing has kept me from saying that in the assembly the value must be less than 1 and the disassembly should also be less than 1
It might seem incoherent
But it is not
If my referral for disassembly is from the purchase I made
I can disassemble the operation with the criterion that the value of the purchase divided by the value of the sale must be less than 1 also
It would be correct too
Why did you say all this?
To understand that you do not have to worry about complex calculations
If we assemble a given ring so that they all cancel at the end
If I have 3 pairs
If the product of them at any given moment is smaller than the other that cancels the operation is when we must make the operation
So if I have 4 pairs
The product of 3 of them must be smaller than the last one in the assembly
In this case we set up the operation
So if I have 4 pairs
The product of 3 of them must be smaller than the last one
In this case we must make the operation
Last edited:
Great
But maybe with 4 pairs further forward
But the important thing is not to lose focus on what you are doing
I'm sure we'll make everything wonderful
For Pannik
I would like to give a suggestion
Put a variable for each one to choose the factor you want
In the configuration you leave has something called exponential
However the exponential is martingale
In that which is exponential could have a field for the person to choose the factor that will be multiplied
For example 1.20 to 20% of the initial lot
1.50 for 50% of the initial lot
So where is exponential who enable has the possibility to choose the multiplicative factor for the next lot
It is the suggestion
I would like to give a suggestion
Put a variable for each one to choose the factor you want
In the configuration you leave has something called exponential
However the exponential is martingale
In that which is exponential could have a field for the person to choose the factor that will be multiplied
For example 1.20 to 20% of the initial lot
1.50 for 50% of the initial lot
So where is exponential who enable has the possibility to choose the multiplicative factor for the next lot
It is the suggestion
1332 orders ?
Which broker accepts this?
I only know the FBS with unlimited account
However lots are multiples of 0.10
Which broker is testing my guru?
- Credits
- 0
Alecksey
What do think best paires to low DD and Good Profit ?
What do think best paires to low DD and Good Profit ?
- Credits
- 0
Alecksey
We have Q I can test same Expert with more Account in the same Brokers (same MT4) ?
Like ICM brokers we can same mt4 wiht more Account test ATA
Thanks
We have Q I can test same Expert with more Account in the same Brokers (same MT4) ?
Like ICM brokers we can same mt4 wiht more Account test ATA
Thanks
The best person to give this information is the creator of the program
I'll give my personal opinion, okay?
I have had good results with pairs 1 and 3 in broker ICMarkets
The creator's recommendation is in spares 3 and 4 that are also doing well on ICmarkets and FBS
For every $ 1000 I recommend in just 1 pair
For a more conservative 2000 account with only 2 pair
My concern is with the amount of orders
You can choose geometrical lot to decrease this
Or open 2 separate accounts to have more slack in the amount of lots
The creator of the program recommends 2000 with 2 pairs (if I'm not mistaken)
I particularly like something more conservative.
The setup can use page 10 that our friend Lucas is using in the real account
The only thing I would change would be the risk factor from 0.5 to 0.25 (more conservative)
But I suggest you take page 10 onwards and read everything carefully
Note: I left some good programs here in the forum today too.
Hugs
- Credits
- 0
Thanks alot But when use the geometrical lot i think thes more risk whith more lots .
Depends on your referential
More risk compared to what?
Opening with fixed lots may take longer because you will need to expect to have a larger amount in the course of operations to make a profit
If you increase the amount progressively, it will be smaller since the following positions will be larger, so it may close faster
Depends on your referential
I particularly prefer with lots increasing
I have 24 open platforms
So far the operations that the lots are progressively increasing are being more profitable than with fixed lots
I do not want to be precocious in my concussion
But so far is this
Alecksey, I don't know if there is a confusion but, for me the most important parameter to control de quantity of opened orders is the StepOpenNextOrders, together with its complementary mode StepOrdersProgress (Statical, Geometrical and Exponential Step).
I became confused when you have mentioned that choosing Geometrical Lot (which is an option of the LotOrdersProgress parameter) may decrease the quantity of orders.
Maybe I have not detailed correctly
For steporderprogress I use statical step
For lot order progress I leave geometrical lot
I read here that the static values are always the same
I'll get the information and post it ok?
The increase I look for is in the opening lots
To decrease the amount of orders I must change to geometrical step
It is here page 10
@El Zorro
Hello
"Type of Progress Step" influence number of opened orders.
Statical is: 'Target Open Next Order (The value is $ per lot)' lf value is 50, for all next orders the step is 50.
Geometrical is: 'Target Open Next Order (The value is $ per lot)' if value is 50, for first next the step is 50, for second next 100, for third next 150, for fourth next 200 eg..
Exponential is: 'Target Open Next Order (The value is $ per lot)' if value is 50, for first next the step is 50, for second next 100, for third next 200, for fourth next 400 eg..
Example:
If we have a distance 1600 units,
with statical step 50 units, we have 20 points (like orders).
with geometrical step 50 units, we have 7.5 points (like orders).
with exponential step 50 units, we have 5.05 points (like orders).
@El ZorroHello
"Type of Progress Step" influence number of opened orders.
Statical is: 'Target Open Next Order (The value is $ per lot)' lf value is 50, for all next orders the step is 50.
Geometrical is: 'Target Open Next Order (The value is $ per lot)' if value is 50, for first next the step is 50, for second next 100, for third next 150, for fourth next 200 eg..
Exponential is: 'Target Open Next Order (The value is $ per lot)' if value is 50, for first next the step is 50, for second next 100, for third next 200, for fourth next 400 eg..
Example:
If we have a distance 1600 units,
with statical step 50 units, we have 20 points (like orders).
with geometrical step 50 units, we have 7.5 points (like orders).
with exponential step 50 units, we have 5.05 points (like orders).
I understood the confusion, hehe
When I referred to the lot increase I did not mean in increasing the amount of new entries (StepOrdersProgress)
I referred in the amount of the LotOrdersProgress
I think it's clear now
It is here page 10
Hello
"Type of Progress Step" influence number of opened orders.
Statical is: 'Target Open Next Order (The value is $ per lot)' lf value is 50, for all next orders the step is 50.
Geometrical is: 'Target Open Next Order (The value is $ per lot)' if value is 50, for first next the step is 50, for second next 100, for third next 150, for fourth next 200 eg..
Exponential is: 'Target Open Next Order (The value is $ per lot)' if value is 50, for first next the step is 50, for second next 100, for third next 200, for fourth next 400 eg..
Example:
If we have a distance 1600 units,
with statical step 50 units, we have 20 points (like orders).
with geometrical step 50 units, we have 7.5 points (like orders).
with exponential step 50 units, we have 5.05 points (like orders).
Exactly.
This the explanation of how the StepOrdersProgress works.
On that ocasion the nomenclature used to define de value in the ATA EA version 1.122 was Target Open Next Order.
This same parameter now is called StepOpenNextOrders in the ATA EA version 1.13 and recent versions.
Also, Pannik presented an explanation of the LotOrdersProgress parameter in Post [HASHTAG]#288[/HASHTAG].
https://soehoe.id/ata_ea-beta-version.t9440/page-15#post-179044
Regards,