New EA DeepGold LLM EA – when gold listens to artificial intelligence (well, almost)

[NPNavigator]

FATAL: LLM EA cannot run in Strategy Tester ..... RUN fast as you can !!

Oh, so much emotion! Just like gold on NFP news — suddenly and without warning.

Let’s take it step by step.

About brokers. I’m not going to help you here — finding an “honest broker” is like looking for a unicorn: everyone has heard of it, but no one has ever seen one. The only advice I can give is: don’t look at reviews with just one star (they’re usually written by people who lost their deposit and are looking for someone to blame), but at regulation, real spreads, and execution conditions. But that’s a topic for a separate discussion.

And now, about the “FATAL ERROR”.

This isn’t a bug, it’s a feature. And it’s documented. If you open the manual (or at least the product description, or the messages in this thread — there are over a hundred of them here), it’s written in black and white:

The advisor doesn’t work in the strategy tester because it requires a live connection to the LLM API.

The reason is simple: the tester doesn’t know how to make HTTP requests to external services. Well, he can’t call DeepSeek and ask, “So, where will the gold go?” So the advisor honestly reports: “I don’t work in the tester, test on the demo.” This isn’t “run away,” it’s “read the manual.”

 

[tinek36]

If first class brokers are scammers than what.

 

[NPNavigator]

If first class brokers are scammers than what.

Dear sir, this forum section is about Expert Advisors, not brokers — here we discuss logic, tests, APIs, and other technical aspects. For broker‑related discussions, there are separate threads where you can vent and discuss regulation, execution, and spreads.

But since you asked, I’ll answer in a friendly manner. There aren’t that many truly “first‑class” brokers with proper regulation (FCA, CySEC, ASIC, etc.), and they usually don’t engage in outright fraud — it’s not profitable for them. Another thing is that a trader may have unrealistic expectations: quick profits, perfect execution, no slippage. The market doesn’t work that way. Sometimes a “scammer” is just a broker who doesn’t let you make money where the trader themselves violates risk management rules.

If everyone around seems like a fraud, it’s worth stopping and checking:

• What type of account are you trading on (demo, cent, real)?

• What are the conditions regarding spreads and commissions?

• Are you exceeding the risk per trade?

• Are you trying to trade against the trend using a martingale in the hope of “getting even”?

Maybe the problem isn’t with the broker, but with the strategy. Or maybe it is with the broker — anything can happen. But in that case, it’s better to open a separate thread with specific facts, rather than making sweeping statements like “all of them are scammers.”

 

[tinek36]

Well i have Ai included into ea .. 6 threads ...6x ai.Kind of ea with brain.

 

[NPNavigator]

Well i have Ai included into ea .. 6 threads ...6x ai.Kind of ea with brain.

“My EA has AI built in... 6 streams... 6x AI. Something like an EA with a brain.”

Mmm... thanks for the info, but, to be honest, I’m lost.

Was that:

• To boast? Like “I have six neural networks, and you only have one”?

• To make a joke? “6 streams” sounds like an advertisement for a washing machine: “6 wash modes, and all with AI.”

• To share an experience? So where are the details — what models, how are the signals combined, who makes the final decision?

• Just a cry in the wilderness? “Anyway, I have an EA with a brain” — and that’s it, end of story.

• Hidden advertisement? If so, then it’s the most mysterious one in the history of forums.

Seriously, the idea of an ensemble of several AI models is actually workable (one looks at the trend, another at the reversal, the third at the news, and the majority votes). But this doesn’t follow from the phrase “6 flows, 6x AI” — we can only speculate.

Explain it in human terms: what models are used, how the decision is made, is there a dashboard, what about delays and token usage. Then we’ll have an interesting discussion. For now, “EA with a brain” sounds like the announcement of a horror movie where there’s a brain but no plot.