New EA Auto Trading Portfolio (Free EA, No Expiration)

I see. OK, perfect ;-)

Just one question. Today I have start new forward test on IC Markets, where leverage is without EU limitations. Now I use version 2.9 and I found that magic number is different than magic number written in EA parametres. Is't OK? In that case, why there is parameter magic number in EA?

For example. On EU pair I set magic number 5001111 but EA opens trade on EU with comment 706143722..

Thanks for your hard work.

D.

 

Hi,

If you want your open trades to be managed by the newer EA, you should set the same base magic number to previous version. The base magic number parameter defines which pair and strategy you use. The EA has 20 built in strategies, if your trade is based on strategy number 1 the comment should be xxx001, if number 2 then xxx002, xxx is base magic number you set on EA parameter. The EA will pick the strategies automatically based on market condition.

Best regards.

 

Good result on Demo account for one month.
Thank you for sharing.

 

Probably we don't understand each other. I started with version 2.9 on new account. No historical trades before this version. And I set in this EA, for example for EU pair, magic number 5001111. As you wrote, comment in open trades should be 500111101 or 500111102 etc. Version 2.0 workes like that. But in version 2.9 there is comment 706143722,706143723 etc. There isn't any magic number like 5001111xy. This is what is strange for me..

 

Maybe better picture ;-)

 

I think the magic number is so large so the number is overflow. Try to lower your magic number.

 

Hi, my apologies, I shoud've informed it since the first post.

The base magic number must be ranged from 100 to 999.

 

Thank you for sharing your result, glad to see it.

We wish you success in forex trading.

 

Large magic number shouldn't affect the trading result, the magic number is just not displayed correctly.

 

Sedikit mau review Om autotradingportfolio .
Untuk V3 AU lebih baik daripada V2.9 dari segi Risk Reward, tapi kalau dilawankan dengan opsi multiply di v2.9 tentu kalah performancenya.
Tapi u V4, belum ada yang bisa mengalahkan performancenya.

Begitu juga dengan GU, v2 jauh lebih aman dibandingkan v2.9 yang aggressive.

Kesimpulannya, ditunggu update untuk V4 untuk semua pairnya yah Om.

Oh iyah, Saya sempat baca diatas, kalau EA sudah running versi sebelumnya, kemudian ingin pakai versi yang terbaru, hanya perlu nyamakan magic no nya saja yah? Thanks sebelumnya.

 

Thank autotradingportfolio
Nice Expert nice back test
The Best one ATP Prototype AUDUSD 4.0 H1 from my view.
other pairs we need Strong SL and TP with out that very risk these
SL AND TP main factor for any strategy in fx I can't trust any Expert without that .
we hope see other pairs like AUDUSD 4.00 like EURUSD / GBPUSD /EURGBP main pairs .
thank you for help

 

Makasih pak atas reviewnya

Iya ini sedang dikerjakan, semoga semua lancar bisa selesai sesuai jadwal.

Betul pak, yang penting Base_Magic_Number nya sama, disarankan 3 digit antara 100 s.d. 999, biar nggak ada masalah di tampilannya.

Best regards.

 

Thank you for your feedback ,

Yes we're still working on it, please wait for it patiently.

Best regards.

 

Dear traders,

if you trades using 10 EAs simultaneously, we suggest you to set the Risk_Level to 0.1, and if you're new and unfamiliar to our EA, please use it on demo account first.

Best regards.

 

Back test EUR/USD V.2
Balance 1000
Leverage 1:200
lot 0.01
2004-2018
99.99 % Quality
Spread 20

 

Thank you for sharing your result with us, we really appreciate it .

Best regards.

 

hello guys,
I'm interesting in this EA ATPPrototype but, for instance, I've just the version 4.0 for EURCHF and AUDUSD. For the other pairs (GBPUSD, USDCAD, EURUSD, EURGBP, EURJPY, NZDUSD, USDCAD, USDCHF and USDJPY) I just have version 2.9.
There's no version 4.0 for these pairs ? Where can I find them ?
Thanks.

 

Please wait patiently, they're under development now

 

Hello autotradingportfolio,
I tested all the pairs on tickstory (01.01.2005 to 31.07.2018) with these parameters : balance=100.000, auto=false, lot=0.2, spread=20 and quality=99;9%.
For each pairs, the result is very, very good... but, for each pair, there's a problem during the period 01.01.2005 to 31.12.2006... The problem consist only on bad result...
Do you know the reason of this problem ? Sur-optimised ? Change in the market (I don't know why, but...) ? Other ?
Thanks for your answer.