New EA ATA_EA (Beta Version)

Ok friends let's get a little serious now with this great EA (ATA_1.13).

MyFxbook: ATA_1.13 Real

From this Monday we go in a real cent account to go more relaxed and with low risk.

As we move forward and see the negative floating we may go up to lower the price, what I want to keep this account with a very low risk.

Broker: FBS
Type of account: Cents
Initial Balance: $ 50,000
Groups (2): 3 and 4
Lot: 0.1



We'll see what happens.

MyFxbook: ATA_1.13 Real

Note: I will remove the demo to leave more speed to the real one.

King Regards.

 

if i have that much to blow $500 that easy ill be rich in months trading the stupid forex
and as i said to lia its complicated everywhere anywhere i mean life in most

nice share

 

Lucas,

Muchos Exitos.. pronto empezare en real tambien...

 

Gracias Edimer, espero que todo vaya bien.

Lo mejor seria ver como evoluciona esa cuenta y cada quien puede hacer sus conclusiones a que riesgo correr.

Saludos.

 

yes, i am switching the option to statical lot progression, i think its very dangerous, and does not give so much advantage using that geometric progression.
i am LIVE using ATA EA on pair 1. set 1

now also trying COUPLEHEDGE_EA starting $200, become $600 in 2 days in demo

 

Thank you for sharing thes amonut and lot equal 500$ and lot = 0.01 ?

 

It can be, but only uses a single group and that is of the lowest gain and risk such as 1, 2 and 3. Group 4 gives more gains but also the negative float is higher.

Greetings.

 

pannik, regarding the parameter "Type of Progress Step", would you please describe to us the difference between the three options (statical, geometrical and exponential) ?

when we change from "statical step" to "geometrical step", which are the variables that influence the increase of the STEP ? the number of opened orders, for example ?

 

El Zorro
Hello

"Type of Progress Step" influence number of opened orders.

Statical is: 'Target Open Next Order (The value is $ per lot)' lf value is 50, for all next orders the step is 50.
Geometrical is: 'Target Open Next Order (The value is $ per lot)' if value is 50, for first next the step is 50, for second next 100, for third next 150, for fourth next 200 eg..
Exponential is: 'Target Open Next Order (The value is $ per lot)' if value is 50, for first next the step is 50, for second next 100, for third next 200, for fourth next 400 eg..

Example:
If we have a distance 1600 units,
with statical step 50 units, we have 20 points (like orders).
with geometrical step 50 units, we have 7.5 points (like orders).
with exponential step 50 units, we have 5.05 points (like orders).

 

pannik, thank you for your clear explanation. i understand that the cuurent ea version dont permit the user to adjust the proportion of the increase of the step.
just an idea, perhaps in the future it would be interesting to include a parameter to control it. regards.

 

This is my review for this thread:
good potential

 

Please You can share the FTEST or best Sitting ?
Thanks All .

 

Please kindly allow us to use our own Magic Number for each group in your next update.
Thanks.

 

Do not forget to place the maximum number of orders the expert can open
In FBS the cent account went from 100 to 200 positions
Therefore 100 positions for each of the charts
Do not forget that you have limit of positions
Except for the account that is unlimited

 

Hello,
There is this option in version 1.13.
Best Regards.

 

Which version ?

 

There is a file with an offer for all members of the forum, please read it, (Promo2017.txt)
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/5ofgbd4y4dkvet4/AABR61PNAvO_BKHb8YxtYyeVa?dl=0

 

Thank You
Whats upp in FTEST ?

 

Hi, Thanks.

FBS accept to 200 open order in cent account.

Regards.

 

Number of orders from some brokers I know
Fxpro = 100 orders
Swissquote = 1000 orders
FBS = 200 orders (cent account)
IC Markets = 200 orders
Activtrades = 500 orders
I have a good program that later I will leave the link for anyone who wants to follow for free
But it works fine on ICMarkets
I did a comparison and ICMarkets despite charging commission and swap the result in general is better than the FBS
You may have swap-free FBS broker
Just talk to the people there.
It follows my state of almost 4 months