Search results

Yes, but only two pairs for instance...

Darwinex, activtrades...

Here are backtests graph (2005-2018)

Hi everyone, I share this EA wich is my own production. For instance, it works only on EURUSD and EURJPY pairs and only on TimeFrame M15. It needs broker with spreads less than 2 pips (4 digits) or 20 (5 digits) or fixed spreads (less than 2 pips). Use settings in the code and modify the AutoMM...

No, differents magic number inside the same pair (each strategy has it own magic inside "global magic" of the pair). But sometimes, in the differents pairs, on my backtests, one or two or three orders exit at the same time... so my question was : are they totaly independant ? Now, it's clear for...

Ok Autotradingportfolio, That's what i understood. I saw the differents magic numbers but you could have differents technics with differents entries and the same issue for all trades on one pair. That the reason why I asked you about. Thanks for your reply, Regards

Hi autotradingportfolio, Just a little technical question... I think this is right but can you please confirm me that each order, on each pair, is independant from all the other orders ? Regards

Mail sent on your PM.

Hi autotradingportfolio, I need to share many results (and questions) with you about ATP_prototype. Can you send me a mail on my personnal adress ([email protected]) in order to send you these results (uploading here is not possible because weight too high - limited on the forum) ? Regards

hi everyone, I tested the version EURUSD v4.0 (excellent, like the other). Just one thing for guys already use V2.9... The magic number is different (500 in version 2.9 and 104 in version 4.0). I don't know if the new version (v4) will continue to manage the eventuals open orders of V2.9 if you...

Hi guys, is there someone how can share this Ea (version 3.2) or explain where and how to download it, please ? Thanks

No problem Drolph, I exactly agree with you. What I made is for compare demo, real and backtest orders because I backtested all pairs with ATP_Prototype since 2005 and the results are good. So i think if the orders are correctly repliqued in demo and live, we can have good results with time...

Hi autotradingportfolio, This message just to inform you that, today, I opened one real account and one demo account with EURGBP, EURJPY ans EURCHF to see if there are difference beetween. In a few days (one or two weeks), I'll compare these two accounts with backtest on exactly the same period...

Thanks autotradingportfolio, No problem, I know that ATP_Prototype is not grid. My question was just and exactely about ESMA rules and margin call. Regards

Hi autotradingportfolio, I've got a question for you... You write that each pair can open 20 trades and there are 10 pairs. So, if each pair open 20 trades, that makes 200 open trades. If you begin just with 0.01 fixed lot, with an account 10.000, that makes 2 lots = level 20, no ? So, it seems...

Hi guys, I confirm what autotradingportfolio said. Yesterday, I compared real results from 12 with my backtests. That need to compare exactly beetween 16 and 24 of August and show concordance around 88%. The difference comes, in my opinion, from spread apply by differents brokers. So, for me...

Thanks, I'll compare with backtests !

Here is the last part of my backtests from 01.01.2005 with ATP_Prototype. I've got a problem with EURJPY (data) so, I'll share this pair as soon as possible.

Agree with you Faryne, So, is there anyone can share his result (statement) on real account with ATP_Prototype ? If there's anyone, we can compare with backtest on the same time...

You're welcome...