Search results

During backtesting (maybe ok) or during normal trading?

I never said that it will win. I just coded the system. The speed is not that important if it would be winning, is it? There are three indicators involved. I do not have any influence on their speed. Most EAs lose. I have not seen any EA that wins consistantly. I think you have to win manually...

The lastest version (incl. inidcators and templates) is in post #48. There is a threadmark. Is there no way to edit the first post #1 to announce version changes?

Have a look into your inbox.

There is no expiration at all.

I "repaired" the code. I hope the error stated above will not accur again. And the informations are translated. And: You have the choice of two templates.

Thank you! But I do not think its time to jugde yet. I just coded the rules of Cyber22 . Thanks to him also.

Yes, exactly. By default the trades are being closed on "appearing of an opposite arrow" or "Price touches the target TMA line". You can also set to "close on a profit relative to lotsize" or "close on an opposite opening".

razor_197 You are a bit touchy, aren't you?

Yes. That is exactly the problem I mentioned in the last post. I will fix it and upload the new version. I have to find the time ... (I have a full time job). Thank you for understanding.

As I told in the first post, the indicators are repainting. I coded many systems with non-repainting indicators. I never found a profitable system. I expect nothing, I just watch. A backtest which I made yesterday told me that there is still an error in the code as it sometimes closes positions...

"Indibar" is the candle number from present for which criteria have to meet. So if set to "21" the trade will be opened when criteria met 21 bars ago.

Running this on a live account is very brave! I would not dare that.

I test with default settings but you may change everything. The only thing: If you change the trade direction to "-1" the positions will not be closed correctly. I have to modify this feature.

It works for me. But it is horribly slow!

I did not backtest. I am forward testing. But I can't see a reason why it should not be possible to backtest.

I did not try. But I don't think you have to attach the indicators.

The alerts are not part of the robot. You can switch them off by changing the settings of the indicator in the sub window. I do not think that you need to attach the indicators at all.

Yes certainly. Thank you for the request. I displayed the values of the Indicators in order to use the right ones for the opening and closing criterias. The next update will have the names in clear text. BTW: You see the magic number used for the actual pair in that information, too.

It is useful to type in the suffix because if you don't the robot uses the same magic number for all pairs.