Search results

Edgae, congratulations for the initiative of developing improvements for this Boss EA. Just a question: the modifications had been applied over the MQ4 code that was gently shared by ADAM53 at his post in the Ea Boss Full Version thread, or you had used any other MQ4 code obtained somewhere...

.

congratulations man, we have to bring to our avatars the love of our life.

pannik, thank you for your clear explanation. i understand that the cuurent ea version dont permit the user to adjust the proportion of the increase of the step. just an idea, perhaps in the future it would be interesting to include a parameter to control it. regards.

pannik, regarding the parameter "Type of Progress Step", would you please describe to us the difference between the three options (statical, geometrical and exponential) ? when we change from "statical step" to "geometrical step", which are the variables that influence the increase of the STEP...

wow... awesome results man. wish you good luck and hope that in a near future you share any of your "hard work robots" with us members of Soehoe community. :)

as we say in my country, your behavior is typical of "whom comment the miracle but don't reveal the Saint".

blackking, i am sure that you would be amazed with the results of this EA. why don't you give a try on your Firewood micro cent account ? i will tell you a secret: when a thread in Soehoe becomes very quiet, much probably there is a very good thing happening somewhere.

pannik, a question: on the previous version 1.121 of the EA, these new parameters included were working as they were configured in ^Statical_Step^ and ^Statical_Lot^ modes, correct ?

pannik, i am running a comparative test of the "Suite of Orders" in a same trading account, and curiously the Suite #1 B-S-B / S-B-S is presenting worse results when compared to the other three Suites. i am also surprised with the Suite #2 B-B-B / S-S-S: i could never imagine that we could get...

Best Regards.[/QUOTE pannik, so based on your explanation, i understand that applying "plus side" and "minus side", both working at the same time over a Group (Group 1 EUR/GBP/USD, for example...) should be much more efficient ?

mantap.

i like when people share mq4 versions of the EAs. thanks.

thanks for sharing.

thank you for the kindness. pannik, would you please provide us an overview about the ^new idea^ and the operation of this EA ?

any kind of restriction on this EA, like expiration date ?

does anybody have a SAXO reader that works with the most recent versions of the Saxo Trader 2 plataform and would gently share with us.

pannik, a sugestion for the next version, would you please release the parameter to manually edit the COMMENT that will be inserted on the trades. this comment is useful to identify the trades during the analysis. thanks.

thanks for sharing. wish you good luck on this project.

patrik, i was looking at my stuff about latency arbitrage and suddenly i located this file (see attached below...). it is funny to see that many of the guys of the past are again developing their efforts around this trading style. good luck my friend.