Suggestion Forex Grid Expert Robot

EA for sharing with the forum to test and show results.

Works on several timeframes though the most profitable I found were the higher periods.

My results came from 99% tick data but haven't tried on demo yet ..just doesn't appeal to me.

EURJPY H4 7YR 615K 25pt spread

EURUSD H4 7YR 180K 20pt spread


GBPUSD H4 7YR 102K 20pt spread

USDJPY H4 7YR 104K 25pt spread


No expiry

Check out everything I have attached which also include optimization reports.
The EA will not work properly without using the default set file.
--
The optimize set file is only for running optimization.

 

It looks good result. Let me try first. Anyway thanks a lot for you give the set file too.

 

HAVING EXPIRY DATE?

 

all GRID EA will eventually die and blow your account.
Plus with lower leverage coming soon, u better be ready.

GRID is one of the most stupid trading system ever made, with deadly combo of Martingale - this is worst

 

EXPIRY

 

Do you know any other method suitable to newly implemented 1:30 leverage?

 

Leverage will be only apply to CFDs

 

Default


Set, 30% dd


Optimize

 

the most funny thing of this is... somebody claims that its coming from a private group of traders

well its the first time for me to know that even private groups of traders lose on this game

i thought if we gather at least two brains together we should make something useful well that make me feel comfortable cuz if i don't do it by my self i wont do it even with help

cheers

 

So what US has 1:50 and EU has 1:30: because everywhere else has whatever they want?
That low leverage only applies with America & Europe..Non regulated brokers(and some still regulated elsewhere) will be the way to go in August for some unfortunate account holders.
Martingale should be used only with a smart strategy - and now only rich traders can use it there.

 

https://soehoe.id/expert-eagle-java-profitable-and-stable-no-expiration.t11688/

 

Thanks

 

My backtest 99,9% EURUSD M15 Spread 1.0 pips since 2017 was not successful.

 

I backtested this EA 99,9% with EURUSD M15, 10.000 EUC Account, 2.5 pips spread in the period 2017 - 2018 now, but it lost the account.





Btw: The "Optimize" setting is not working at all. I think, you posted the wrong EA here?

 

@ronaldo_rene
-- Could just be your data or unfinished trades. I am using tick data suite with histdata.com; and there can still be seen gaps.

1 ) . The optimize set file is used for running optimizations which I don't think anyone got from this thread.
I took care to attach text files of optimizations done using I believe open or control point pricing.
Much better settings than the default settings.

2 ) . I ran a back-test from start of 2000 to present on EURUSD with 10k using the default set file on M15, with spread of 25;


The EA had a few unfinished trades


This is supposedly a no loss EA but you need to take into account money management factors since that's mainly what this strategy is about.
I mean it is somewhat appealing to me just that there isn't so much of an indicator strategy and more of a money management strategy.

 

This is my review for this thread:
good mantaps

 

very good ea

 

Try this EURUSD H4

 

Getestete Kerzen 2369
Modellierte Ticks 1432836
Modellierungsqualität n/a
Fehler in Chartanpassung 118
Ursprüngliche Einzahlung 100.00
Spread Aktuell (2)
Nettoprofit gesamt 953.78
Bruttoprofit 1143.65
Bruttoverlust -189.87
Profitfaktor 6.02
Erwartetes Ergebnis 12.07
Absoluter Rückgang 19.07
Maximaler Rückgang 187.47 (37.26%)
Relativer Rückgang 59.45% (119.48)
Anzahl an Trades 79
Sell-Positionen (davon gewonnen %) 60 (71.67%)
Buy-Positionen (davon gewonnen %) 19 (78.95%)
Gewonne Trades (in % von Gesamt) 58 (73.42%)
Verlorene Trades (in % von Gesamt) 21 (26.58%)
Größter
Gewinntrade 100.48
Verlusttrade -26.43
Durchschnitt
Gewinntrade 19.72
Verlusttrade -9.04
Maximum
Gewinntrades in Folge (Profit in Geld) 13 (182.53)
Verlusttrades in Folge (Verlust in Geld) 3 (-42.69)
Maximum
Gewinn aufeinanderfolgender Gewinntrades (Anzahl) 182.53 (13)
Verlust aufeinanderfolgender Verlusttrades (Anzahl) -42.69 (3)
Durchschnitt
Gewinntrades in Folge 4
Verlusttrades in Folge 2