Recent content by Heltoneli

This was another test done with the ATP version v2.9, fixed size of 0.01, in a period of August 1 until today November 9, where an Over-optimized was not done, to know what the results would be. I am doing these tests to be able to help with the development, not to criticize, and together we...

To have a greater history, I am using Activtrades

the separate back tests you can do alone, is to download the history and use the program ATP

Of course, the most significant risk in any trading strategy development is “over-optimization,” also referred to as “curve fitting.” Over-optimization will result in trading strategies where the historical performance is vastly superior to subsequent live trading.

in this period from 2007 to 2018 he did an optimization with thousands of back tests, and passed the best result, you do not see the negative results, this program does not allow adjustments in the parameters of the 20 strategies that are in their internal, we can help to improve! What I did...

I do not think it is that different, he made a period of 11 years from 2007 to 2018 and the average of openings was 4000 trades per change and I took a period of 6 years from 2000 to 2006 and the average trades is of 2300 per exchange

this is a good book, to get better results from your EA without there being a super optimization

ATP 2000 2006.pdf I'm sure this program is very optimized, using the same currency changes, so a period that has not been optimized does not look pretty so, for me this would be the real progress of the program.

so you draw your own conclusions

if you permit I can put a pdf

I'm sure this program is very optimized, using the same currency changes, so a period that has not been optimized does not look pretty so, for me this would be the real progress of the program.

This is my review for this thread: Very good

Very Good

Very good